• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

RBR Bivol vs Zurdo DAZN Nov.5th

No way does Clenelo take that Bivol rematch. If he does my respect for him shoots up even higher. Bivol isn't a great finisher probably one of the worst of the elite fighters right now but I think he'd stop him sometime late. Clenelo's cardio has never been the best and it's shown signs of slippage of late. Ancient Gennady winning most of the late rounds against him was a bad sign.
 
No, I had it one round different than 2 of the official judges. What'd you have, a shutout for Bivol with a few 10-8 rounds in there?

The official cards were generous, and 1 round extra to Zurdo is way off in that context. This was not an 8-4 fight. Being 1-2 rounds off matters alot in scoring.
 
Looks like AJ likes Bivol's style. He could probably improve under Bivol's trainer.



Joshua is already pretty damn good and has a similar style to Bivol. Of course Bivol does the same things Joshua does, but in a more subtle way. Joshua could definitely improve if these two joined forces.
 
Just caught up on event, gutted for Zelfa Barrett, thought he was boxing really well, but Rakimov eventually caught up with him. Barrett showed that he belongs at that level though.
Bivol just ouclassed Ramirez, him v Beterbiev would be a top fight, hope that happens after Yarde.
 
Chaotic night at work so far… never got a chance to sneak a peak at fight, but sounds like it went about as much Bivols way as I would have guessed.
 
But you scored it wider than the judges.You were further off than I was.

Further off isn’t genuine here considering there wasn’t another round to give Zurdo, aside from 2/3/10. Which round did you egregiously give him?

Here is the breakdown: https://boxrec.com/en/scoring/2888277

It’s easy to cop-out and say “wELl i WAs oNly a ROunD oFf!” but the issue is people give rounds to guys that are clearly wrong.
 
The difference is I know that boxing judges are generally unreliable, while you still have not learned that lesson.
Seano is a total clown that will side with the judges no matter what, ignoring the corruption and incompetence. He thinks Bradley beat Pacquiao and Canelo beat GGG in the 1st fight. It’s sad.
 
Y’all suck as judges




If you pay me I’ll might be willing to take you under the wing, maybe
 
The difference is I know that boxing judges are generally unreliable, while you still have not learned that lesson.
Or you're not so clever as you think you are, as you've been told repeatedly by everyone in the forum.
 
Seano is a total clown that will side with the judges no matter what, ignoring the corruption and incompetence. He thinks Bradley beat Pacquiao and Canelo beat GGG in the 1st fight. It’s sad.
I scored Pac/Bradley a draw, actually. Which was the same fight the judges saw and I had this one 1 round different than 2 of the judges. I mean, sorry, you can act as snide and pissy as you want but that means YOU got it wrong, not me. I notice a trend of you coming up with wide scores for fighters you like, scores that none of the officials seemed to see and then you act pompous about it.
 
Y’all suck as judges




If you pay me I’ll might be willing to take you under the wing, maybe
Didn't you have almost the same score as me ?
 
Back
Top