• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) We may experience a temporary downtime. Thanks for the patience.

Crime Guy RNCed on NY subway dies.

To be fair the other two guys weren't choking him.

The other two were preventing Neely from being able to have any kind of defense.

They're accessories, and they'd be charged as accessories of manslaughter if they were white.
 
The DA isn't challenging that notion though, manslaughter 2nd implies there is no malicious intent to kill someone, just recklessness.

And worthy of a 10 year prison sentence?

https://www.lawinfo.com/resources/c...untary-manslaughter-penalties-sentencing.html

Don't bullshit us by implying the district attorney, who wants another high-profile criminal case, analyzed the situation and concluded he had no choice but to prosecute Penny.

...after giving Neely 40+ slaps on the wrist.

You mentioned you agree Neely should have been in a jail cell that night rather than free. Its the NYC DA's attornies of the laat decade who are at fault for that one.
 
The other two were preventing Neely from being able to have any kind of defense.

They're accessories, and they'd be charged as accessories of manslaughter if they were white.

You can't be accessory for a crime that lacks criminal intent.
 
In the moment his criminal record wasn't relevant.

He got on the subway and while it was in motion, meaning everyone was possibly his captive, he threatened everyone with physical violence by yelling he wasn't afraid to go back to jail and he's prepared to serve a life sentence.

Think about that, and that doesn't take into account Neely's history of violently assaulting innocents, including a man and woman in their 60s.

In that circumstance Penny was 100% justified in physically restraining Neely. His death was accidental and Penny's prosecution is purely political.

Go ahead, ask me how its political.
Almost no one in this thread has argued that he was wrong for taking action. The problem people have is that he choked him for 3 minutes.

It’s kind of tedious constantly seeing people play this game where they pretend we have an issue him taking action. If he simply choked the guy out and let it go I there wouldn’t be an issue. I would be applauding the dude. That’s not what happened though. Let’s stop this silly game where you pretend we are condemning him for intervening and be honest, recognize what people are actually saying he did wrong.
 
How about charging them for 'Civil Rights Violations?'

What civil rights did they violated?

Like Darek Chauvin's fellow officers on the scene where George Floyd died?

Can't you tell the difference between that case and this one?

My point being is is the prosecutor wanted to charge them, he'd charge them with anything. Period.

Sure, any prosecutor can charge anyone with any BS they want, that shit would be thrown in court real fast though.

And the reason why he's not charging them is blatantly obvious.

They committed no crime, that's blatantly obvious.
 
Almost no one in this thread has argued that he was wrong for taking action. The problem people have is that he choked him for 3 minutes.

Was it 3 minutes? Or 15 minutes?

The specifics of how long the choke was applied have been very sketchy, at best.

Cell phone footage has revealed Penny let the choke go and immediately put Neely on his side. That shows Penny wasn't wrecklessly cranking on the choke for minutes on end.

What civil rights did they violated?
'Civil Rights Crimes' are, and always have been, vague and have been used only under the weakest of circumstances, like this one.

They committed no crime, that's blatantly obvious.

Yeah, in the eyes of the DA, they committed no crime because they're not white.
 
Was it 3 minutes? Or 15 minutes?

The specifics of how long the choke was applied have been very sketchy, at best.

Cell phone footage has revealed Penny let the choke go and immediately put Neely on his side. That shows Penny wasn't wrecklessly cranking on the choke for minutes on end.


'Civil Rights Crimes' are, and always have been, vague and have been used only under the weakest of circumstances, like this one.



Yeah, in the eyes of the DA, they committed no crime because they're not white.
It was 3 minutes. The 15 minutes thing came from shit online reporting. 15 minutes was how long it took the cops to get there. The cell phone footage you are talking about starts with the choke already applied and it’s like at least 30 seconds into the video before he releases it. There is no video of the beginning of the incident.

I kind of feel like you know this though and are just trying score points or something
 
It was 3 minutes. The 15 minutes thing came from shit online reporting. 15 minutes was how long it took the cops to get there.

Yeah, I know that. '3 minutes' is a very exact time, 180 seconds, which is why I'm also doubting that estimated timeframe.

The cell phone footage you are talking about starts with the choke already applied and it’s like at least 30 seconds into the video before he releases it. There is no video of the beginning of the incident.

No cell phone footage... that we know of.

The footage of Penny releasing the choke and putting Neely on his side was made public days afterward. It wouldn't surprise me if the police, and therefore the prosecutors & defense have additional footage from one of the supposedly dozens of people on the subway car.

I kind of feel like you know this though and are just trying score points or something

Points? You're basically scraping the bottom of the barrel to argue against my points this is a politically motivated prosecution.
 
'Civil Rights Crimes' are, and always have been, vague and have been used only under the weakest of circumstances, like this one.

I have yet to find "civil rights crime" under NY State law, care to point out which law could be applied to the other guys?

Yeah, in the eyes of the DA, they committed no crime because they're not white.

So far i have yet to find any felony under which the two other guys could be charged.

Care to help me with this one? or are you going to act like the woke idiots you complain about so much?

I don't disagree that Bragg may be racially biased when the victims/offenders are black, but this case 2nd Manslaughter seems like a pretty fair charge all things considered.
 
It was 3 minutes. The 15 minutes thing came from shit online reporting. 15 minutes was how long it took the cops to get there. The cell phone footage you are talking about starts with the choke already applied and it’s like at least 30 seconds into the video before he releases it. There is no video of the beginning of the incident.

I kind of feel like you know this though and are just trying score points or something
Honest question. How do we know it was three minutes if the video only shows 30 seconds? Is that an estimate?
 
I have yet to find "civil rights crime" under NY State law, care to point out which law could be applied to the other guys?

Care to help me with this one? or are you going to act like the woke idiots you complain about so much?

2nd degree manslaughter / involuntary manslaughter.

"Involuntary Manslaughter
Involuntary manslaughter is defined as an unintentional killing that results either from recklessness or criminal negligence or from the commission of a low-level criminal act such as a misdemeanor. Involuntary manslaughter is distinguished from other forms of homicide because it does not require deliberation or premeditation, or even intent. Since these mental states are not required, involuntary manslaughter is the lowest category of homicide."

https://www.justia.com/criminal/offenses/homicide/involuntary-manslaughter/

They can also be charged with the same crime Penny currently is, and that's why they won't be witnesses in his defense at the trial. Intimidation tactic by the prosecution, because if Penny is still found guilty by the jury it makes them far easier to prosecute afterward.
 
2nd degree manslaughter / involuntary manslaughter.

"Involuntary Manslaughter
Involuntary manslaughter is defined as an unintentional killing that results either from recklessness or criminal negligence or from the commission of a low-level criminal act such as a misdemeanor. Involuntary manslaughter is distinguished from other forms of homicide because it does not require deliberation or premeditation, or even intent. Since these mental states are not required, involuntary manslaughter is the lowest category of homicide."

What exactly did those guys did to kill Neely?


https://www.justia.com/criminal/offenses/homicide/involuntary-manslaughter/

They can also be charged with the same crime Penny currently is, and that's why they won't be witnesses in his defense at the trial. Intimidation tactic by the prosecution, because if Penny is still found guilty by the jury it makes them far easier to prosecute afterward.

No, they can't because its a crime without mens rea, how can you prove intent to help commit a crime that has no intent?
 
Honest question. How do we know it was three minutes if the video only shows 30 seconds? Is that an estimate?

Its an estimate.

Eyewitness estimations for timeframes are always horribly inaccurate. One witness may say it was a minute, another says 3 minutes, another says 5 minutes, and another says 10.

Unless there's cellphone footage of the entire incident from beginning to end there's no way to have exact time that Neely was being choked.
 
Back
Top