Social Joy Reid Defends Books with Pedophilia in Public School Librairies

[Sara]

you are all over the place. you never said graphic you said fiction you liar i get you're ashamed but you said it own it.

Oh please I was arguing against some moron that was justifying 10 and under reading smut as it would “save them”, and I was clearly talking about the book inspired by this thread.

 

[AfroBanana]

Them being a hate group who have mischaracterized numerous books while being willing to employ sexual degenerates isnt irrelevant.

In all fairness…. the same can be said about teachers. Not many days go by where a teacher isn’t preaching hate at a specific group, being sexually inappropriate, having inappropriate sexual relationships with students or getting caught doing things like putting cameras in bathrooms / locker rooms etc in the public school systems.

 

[Sara]

I haven’t read them all.

To be safe obviously burn them all

 

[Islam Imamate]

Are you fucking kidding me? Saying kids do not need to read GRAPHIC books is not saying they don’t need books at all. I do not have double standards, I said ban graphically violent and sexual books. I used those to as an example of a level I found inappropriate. I mentioned how I had read Lolita for a book report and that was also inappropriate.


And I’m saying abused or non abused kids do not need to read the book this very thread was made about, not that both kids don’t need books in general.


Serious question do you have kids?

Just because kids don't need to read a given book doesn't mean that book should be removed from school libraries. They don't need to and certainly won't read the vast majority of books in any given library, the point of a library is to offer a wide selection so they can decide on their own what to read and what not to read.

It's interesting how this mirrors Rob's position on property rights (which was that if people are free to develop their land as they see fit, they might make decisions that are aesthetically unappealing to him). If educators are allowed to make decisions about what reading material to make available, some might choose things that could be disturbing to some kids. A lot of this just comes down to how comfortable you are letting other people have the freedom to make decisions, but it gets presented as a discussion about the specifics of the books.

Its kind of an older conception of America freedom, freedom not of the individual but of the community to govern itself and to shape its physical and social environment according to community norms.

 

[shockaholic12]

I have kids. I also have a wife who is both a licensed forensic interviewer of child sexual abuse victims and director at non-profit that serves as advocates for child abuse victims. If you want to know personal life stuff.

Abuse happens at home from people they know. not stranger danger. it's complicated for them because of this and is often occurring to kids before and throughout elementary school and middle school.

 

[Islam Imamate]

tbh, those books sucked.

We agree on this at least.

 

[shockaholic12]

Oh please I was arguing against some moron that was justifying 10 and under reading smut as it would “save them”, and I was clearly talking about the book inspired by this thread.

"And yes that’s exactly what I said. Abused kids in particular don’t read."

you are so embarrassed i get it i would be too but you typed this and hit post dummy.

 

[BFoe]

Do they graphically fuck each other for their adventures?

Only if you choose it.

 

[William Munny]

I haven’t read them all.

Only if you choose it.

ok...this is some level 10 comedy shit here.

well played by both of you

 

[BFoe]

ok...this is some level 10 comedy shit here.

well played by both of you

We should probably rename them “Consent To Your Own Adventure,” just to make sure our bases are covered.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

I have kids. I also have a wife who is both a licensed forensic interviewer of child sexual abuse victims and director at non-profit that serves as advocates for child abuse victims. If you want to know personal life stuff.

Abuse happens at home from people they know. not stranger danger. it's complicated for them because of this and is often occurring to kids before and throughout elementary school and middle school.

if anyone lets their minor child look at graphic material, they should have their kids taken away.

 

[BFoe]

if anyone lets their minor child look at graphic material, they should have their kids taken away.

Speaker Mike Johnson uses his underage kid as his “porn accountability partner.” It’s ok though and not weird or perverse at all, because he’s a good Christian Republican man.

 

[William Munny]

We should probably rename them “Consent To Your Own Adventure,” just to make sure our bases are covered.

again, 10/10 shit.

you guys are geniuses.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Speaker Mike Johnson uses his underage kid as his “porn accountability partner.” It’s ok though and not weird or perverse at all, because he’s a good Christian Republican man.

can you explain how that relates to providing graphic material to minor children.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Speaker Mike Johnson uses his underage kid as his “porn accountability partner.” It’s ok though and not weird or perverse at all, because he’s a good Christian Republican man.

isn't that like the opposite of letting your kids watch smut?

 

[nostradumbass]

Doesn't matter if its not needed, it has obvious literary value and students should be able to access it at their school library. Can't believe I have to argue the literary value of the Bible as a Muslim.

In the case of Escambia County in Florida it seems its both the original and the graphic novel

https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-781580

https://www.pnj.com/story/news/loca...ida-freedom-to-read-project-says/72169101007/

Your link says it hasn't been "banned" from the school, it's one of a bunch of books being reviewed.


The 1,000+ books they reference have not been banned or removed from the school district; rather, they have simply been pulled for further review to ensure compliance with the new legislation," according to ECPS spokesperson Cody Strother.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Wait til she hears what its actually about.

I don't think its a strawman, as I pointed out to Sara Maus and The Diary of Anne Frank were removed in a Florida school district so the idea that this is just about a small number of uniquely graphic books and that it won't affect classics with obvious literary value doesn't seem to be the case. I'm sure a liberal atheist parent could comb the Bible and find plenty of graphic content there but it would be absurd to remove the Bible from a school library for that reason.

I asked you specifically about graphic sexual content. Not what happened in Florida.

 

[HereticBD]

can you explain how that relates to providing graphic material to minor children.

Because a father and his 17 year old son keeping tabs on each other, to dissuade one another from viewing pornographic material, is the exact same thing as elementary schools encouraging third graders to view pornographic material...apparently...

 

[shockaholic12]

if anyone lets their minor child look at graphic material, they should have their kids taken away.

does a 16 year old teen seeing a photo of war injuries/causalities or holocaust victims go straight to the orphanage in your church of the thin skinned?

what about a bloody MMA fight?

 

[nostradumbass]

Speaker Mike Johnson uses his underage kid as his “porn accountability partner.” It’s ok though and not weird or perverse at all, because he’s a good Christian Republican man.

So the exact opposite of porn for kids is your bizarre complaint? You just said on the first page "be a parent and don't let your kids read or watch it", and now you've shifted all the way over to complaining when someone does exactly that and leads by example by proving he's not watching it either?