Crime Harvard professor says ‘all hell broke loose’ when his study found no racial bias in police shootings

blackheart said:
You should really bother actually reading articles instead of just headlines and immediately rushing to reaffirm your biases that already existed

Here's an admission from the study itself
"There are no systematic datasets which include officer involved shootings along with demographics, encounter characteristics, and suspect and police behavior. We compile a data set on officer-involved shootings from ten locations across America"

God DAMN - that's a pretty fucking big problem with the study's design isn't it? They don't have a dataset on officer involved shootings that includes demographics??? They compiled their own data from 10 American cities? Who is doing that compiling? What data are they selecting?

Tell me you've never stepped foot in a college classroom without telling me you've never stepped foot in a college classroom

"Hurr durrrr, me see headline that confirms what I already believe. Me believe headline instantly"
86ab6942c40e86b38bee4f7109f90070.gif
Click to expand...
<Dany07>

You should learn to read. The word "and" and the word "or" are not the same word, you complete retard. Yeah, this damn Harvard professor is a black white supremacist who has probably never stepped foot in a college classroom and has nothing on your 6 credit hours from a community college in a strip mall next to your karate dojo.


Lol at having a meltdown after finding out you're not a victim and police are not hunting you. I'm sorry that happened to you. This must be a very difficult time to find out you're not a victim, and instead are just a stupid dupe who fell for a blatant grift to take donations to buy mansions.

iu
 
Record levels of self owning in this thread. Op got blown the fuck out of the water before the first page was done.
 
Last edited:
nostradumbass said:
<Dany07>

You should learn to read. The word "and" and the word "or" are not the same word, you complete retard. Yeah, this damn Harvard professor is a black white supremacist who has probably never stepped foot in a college classroom and has nothing on your 6 credit hours from a community college in a strip mall next to your karate dojo.
Click to expand...
Absolutely no one said that. But go ahead and keep inventing my statements for me and living up to your username.
nostradumbass said:
Lol at having a meltdown after finding out you're not a victim and police are not hunting you. I'm sorry that happened to you. This must be a very difficult time to find out you're not a victim, and instead are just a stupid dupe who fell for a blatant grift to take donations to buy mansions.
Click to expand...
Lol @ being so fucking stupid and unwilling to read that you'd cite a study where the study's author says you're wrong.
 
blackheart said:
This is like, "I'm going to read the definition of a word, but I'm going to stop after the first 2 words of the definition"

Really galaxy brained stuff here.

You JUST said "you think you know more than a Harvard professor?" The Harvard professor is saying you're wrong. He's saying his own study isn't evidence of anything.

Again, are you ever going to get tired of owning yourself?
Click to expand...
Lol, you're such clown. Yes, you already attacked the study's design and no the professor never says his study isn't evidence of anything. You're embarrassing yourself at this point.
 
Fox News wrote an article, about a study that they had already written an article about 8 years ago.

Must be an incredibly slow news day in MAGA land.
 
Mr Holmes said:
Lol, you're such clown. Yes, you already attacked the study's design and no the professor never says his study isn't evidence of anything. You're embarrassing yourself at this point.
Click to expand...
Yes, he did. In the 2016 fox article about the same study. He said it's not evidence of broader national trends. You sure are slow aren't you?

You're literally owning yourself every single time you post in here and you're too dumb to recognize it.
 
blackheart said:
Yes, he did. In the 2016 fox article about the same study. He said it's not evidence of broader national trends. You sure are slow aren't you?

You're literally owning yourself every single time you post in here and you're too dumb to recognize it.
Click to expand...
is "not evidence of broader national trends" the same as "not evidence of anything"? Did your mom chain smoke while she was pregnant with you?
 
Lucas1980 said:
Why would anyone be mad at this study It was already obvious and actually Good News...I don't get it
Click to expand...
No one is mad about the study. You and the other chud chucklefucks are lying about the study.
 
nostradumbass said:
The new news is you having a meltdown and having 13 posts in a 2 page thread crying like a bitch because you're pissed that you're not a victim.
Click to expand...
I'm white moron. Any other desperate flailing and grasping at straws you wanna do?
 
Mr Holmes said:
is "not evidence of broader national trends" the same as "not evidence of anything"? Did your mom chain smoke while she was pregnant with you?
Click to expand...
Hahahahahahahaha. You literally did the God of the gaps argument, a widely recognized fallacy, while suggesting I have a learning disability. Holy fuck. This is post modern comedy gold.

"Oh OK, so this isn't evidence of anything, but does that mean it's evidence of NOTHING?! Got you!!"

You really thought that was an own didn't you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Arkain2K
Social Legacy Admission: Harvard Under Fire For Helping Elite Skip The Queue
2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
rearnakedchoke
rearnakedchoke

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,238,041
Messages
55,533,321
Members
174,819
Latest member
TeKa

Share this page

Back
Top