- Joined
- Mar 31, 2008
- Messages
- 43,938
- Reaction score
- 45,200
You should really bother actually reading articles instead of just headlines and immediately rushing to reaffirm your biases that already existed
Here's an admission from the study itself
"There are no systematic datasets which include officer involved shootings along with demographics, encounter characteristics, and suspect and police behavior. We compile a data set on officer-involved shootings from ten locations across America"
God DAMN - that's a pretty fucking big problem with the study's design isn't it? They don't have a dataset on officer involved shootings that includes demographics??? They compiled their own data from 10 American cities? Who is doing that compiling? What data are they selecting?
Tell me you've never stepped foot in a college classroom without telling me you've never stepped foot in a college classroom
"Hurr durrrr, me see headline that confirms what I already believe. Me believe headline instantly"
You should learn to read. The word "and" and the word "or" are not the same word, you complete retard. Yeah, this damn Harvard professor is a black white supremacist who has probably never stepped foot in a college classroom and has nothing on your 6 credit hours from a community college in a strip mall next to your karate dojo.
Lol at having a meltdown after finding out you're not a victim and police are not hunting you. I'm sorry that happened to you. This must be a very difficult time to find out you're not a victim, and instead are just a stupid dupe who fell for a blatant grift to take donations to buy mansions.