The course sounds super objective.
As stupid as I think FL’s objections were, the creators of the course did
make a bunch of changes in response to them. They removed the authors that got FL’s panties in a bunch, totally eliminated the Movement for Black Lives unit, scrubbed the Queer Studies unit that had you scurred earlier ITT beyond recognition and even removed the word “queer” altogether because you Don’t Say Gay in FL, after all
They
added a bunch of new units too, that deal with music, theater, film, sports, and WW2. If you look at that
syllabus from earlier and compare it to what you posted, you’ll see the differences. Additionally, they built in a whole extra week that students/teacher can use for a deeper dive on whatever they choose. If something happens in the news that’s relevant, they can do a massive deep-dive on it. If they feel the reading sources in a given topic aren’t objective or diverse enough, they can choose to explore that topic much further, read differing views, and so forth.
—None of this is what indoctrination looks like. It’s what learning looks like.
Topic 4.15 isn’t Intersectionality and Activism anymore, it was replaced by “Economic Growth and Black Political Representation.” None of this mattered to FL of course, because their objections were insincere and made in bad faith from the start. Nothing was ever going to change their mind.
Quick soap box rant:
It won’t fucking scar students for life to have to read ideas.
Example: I would argue that one cannot understand economics, most of 20th century American history including the Cold War, and even the current situation in Ukraine, without understanding Karl Marx. It’s essential. And reading Marx for that purpose isn’t “indoctrination,” for fucking crying out loud. Nobody has to
agree with Marx, they just need to understand him.
I don’t have the OG syllabus for that class before the changes, but I’d bet those authors that FL objected to weren’t the only reading source for that topic. Pretty much all of those topics have several different reading sources, and there’s 101 topics FFS. These objections are so pathetic they are hardly worth mentioning, let alone entertaining.
Republicans want to create an environment where students never encounter an idea that conflicts with GOP political views. That’s what actual indoctrination looks like.