In less than 50 years they will be ready for an invasion. By then they will have infiltrated Iraq with pro-Iranian politicians, they already have Asad as a loyal ally, China and Russia will be backing them. They will definitely be capable of launching an invasion.What do you think Iran is capable of doing to Israel? Like, you don’t think they’re capable golf an invasion do you?
I find it weird how westerners are cheering on repressive regimes that their own people want gone.
Quite the window you give to those clowns.In less than 50 years
A lot of Iranians do not agree with Sharia law. You haven’t been following the news muchIn less than 50 years they will be ready for an invasion. By then they will have infiltrated Iraq with pro-Iranian politicians, they already have Asad as a loyal ally, China and Russia will be backing them. They will definitely be capable of launching an invasion.
I'm not gonna act like Iran is some comic villain that must be defeated for the greater good or something just because they implement some social policies that seem backwards to outsiders. The reality is most Iranians agree with Sharia law, modesty police and all that. If Islamism is exactly what the society wants who are we to tell them we know what's really good for them.
They are heavily nominal and many of the Diaspora that I've met, view Islam as foreign and corrosive element to their historically rich culture.A lot of Iranians do not agree with Sharia law. You haven’t been following the news much
They are heavily nominal and many of the Diaspora that I've met, view Islam as foreign and corrosive element to their historically rich culture.
Fucking lol
I don't think anyone on Sherdog has any sort of understanding of the process of nuclear weapons proliferation and development, and any such posturing is retarded.
No offence to either of you, but there's a Reuters article that you're both arguing either end of in a best case/worst case scenario, and they even used the car analogy that Iran used that you've been batting back and forth. The conclusion quite clearly is: nobody knows where Iran is at, because Trump is a giant dumbass who effectively withdrew the team that inspects Iran's actions out of Iran and blinded the world to whatever progress they are or are not making.
The assumption that Iran might not have the expertise to fully develop a nuke is shaky since they're almost partnered up with Russia, who definitely do know how.
All in all, another big 'W' for Donald who made the Middle East a much less safe place.
I wasnt joking. They are a paper tiger who ran out of ammo fighting a militia and needed America to bail them out.
Which is why i call you dishonestI am comfortable with my posturing statements, thank you. I am certain that I have completed more graduate level coursework in STEM than most posters and certainly more than Rod1 based on the content of his posts.
Iran does not has nuclear weapons and would not be able to procure them as long as JCPOA stands.If you follow the conversation back you will see that I did not claim certainty that the “worst case” scenario would have happened. I was mainly taking issue with @Rod1 greatly overstating the deal as being this hermetic pact which would have inevitably caused Iranian denuclearization.
Bibi jumped through the hoops to talk to Trump directly knowing he is a very manipulable moron, so yeah he is singly guilty for the deal failing.Yes, you are absolutely correct Trump is primarily to blame as well, but our friend here has repeatedly claimed that Bibi is singly guilty.
Which is why i call you dishonest
Iran does not has nuclear weapons and would not be able to procure them as long as JCPOA stands.
NYTs reporting that Israel used a low-visibility “stealth” air to surface missile that struck the radar component of a Russian S-300 system. Iranian air defenses did not detect it.
Pretty badass piece of equipment.Rampage (missile) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
UK was looking to buy the missile after donating Storm Shadow to Ukraine.
Because you are constantly moving the goalposts and using grammatical arguments.Because you think I am lying about myself or I am wrong about you?
You haven’t learned anything.
Pretty badass piece of equipment.
Because you are constantly moving the goalposts and using grammatical arguments.
You want to be in a position where you don't look like an unhinged moron being in direct contradiction with the entirety of the collective West, the IAEA and the US own experts in the matter, but you also want to be right.
So you are simply using grammatical sophism to create a strawman where you can at the same time discredit me personally without having to take a stand whatsoever.
Again, is everyone wrong except Israel?
"total denuclearization" again, this is the whole grammatical argument you are trying to make.The experts you keep quoting supported the Iran deal (this is not my our point of contention as I have repeatedly not expressed a strong opinion on the matter) They did not however, claim that it would lead to total denuclearization as you keep claiming. (Point of contention).