According to Sherdog;I hate all these "aged poorly" rewrites.
How does this explain him beating Aldo,Alvarez and Mendes??
Fluke. Never that good and had a retarded gameplan. Full camp Mendes would have won.
According to Sherdog;I hate all these "aged poorly" rewrites.
How does this explain him beating Aldo,Alvarez and Mendes??
Why did it take Khabib 4 rounds to do what Diaz did in 2 rounds?Conor had an amazing run until he fought Nate Diaz, then he gassed out and lost to one of the worst fighters in the entire UFC roster nate diaz. Looking back, that loss really stamped Conors actual skill level in the UFC, which he wasn't super good. He was a B tier fighter at most, he would lose to guys like Khabib most times and guys like Porier are better than him as well. Now we have Conor fighting a "Bellator Tick" who's like 1-3 in the UFC, should be interesting to see a Bellator level fight in the UFC.
I hate all these "aged poorly" rewrites.
How does this explain him beating Aldo,Alvarez and Mendes??
Actually he was #6. Nice try though.
Do you really somehow just not understand that Diaz taking off 3 years and still coming back to easily defeat a LW/WW contender in Pettis completely disproves the idea that Diaz aged poorly?3 years later. There it is.
Nate could have potentially taken advantage of the Conor fights to do something in the sport but instead he sat out for 3 years. He wasn't a contender before or after the fight. Conor's loss to Nate hasn't aged one way or another because Nate didn't do shit afterwards.
Why did it take Khabib 4 rounds to do what Diaz did in 2 rounds?
So no skill involved? Just size? Didn't they both make weight beforehand? Isn't Khabib bigger than Nate?Diaz was 3x his size.
So no skill involved? Just size? Didn't they both make weight beforehand? Isn't Khabib bigger than Nate?
Lol. My sarcasm detector didnt pick up. My bad.Diaz was 4x his size.
Lol. My sarcasm detector didnt pick up. My bad.
View attachment 1041057View attachment 1041056
Wow would you look at that. I was right that Nate was in fact #5 in the first fight and #4 in the rematch.
Alvarez was washed at the timeI hate all these "aged poorly" rewrites.
How does this explain him beating Aldo,Alvarez and Mendes??
Who else?I hate all these "aged poorly" rewrites.
How does this explain him beating Aldo,Alvarez and Mendes??
I gave you enough.Who else?
OofNate was in fact #5 in the first fight, and #4 in the 2nd.
I'd call this revionist history, but you probably weren't even around to know that in the first place.
Diaz clearly > Khabib, lololWhy did it take Khabib 4 rounds to do what Diaz did in 2 rounds?
Different style, Different fight,different night.Why did it take Khabib 4 rounds to do what Diaz did in 2 rounds?
So no skill involved? Just size? Didn't they both make weight beforehand? Isn't Khabib bigger than Nate?
Thank you proving that no, you were indeed not around back then.Lmao you just exposed the UFC's BS because he was not top 5 right before the fight. How sneaky.
Fighter Rankings | UFC ®
web.archive.org
The wayback machine has been a god send.