Are people better looking now then they were in previous generations?

[listrahtes]

Yes. John Lennon and Yoko Oho were sex symbols. If they were the sex symbols can you imagine how your average person looked?

What a load of crap No one thought of Lennon or Yoko as sex symbols. Lennon had fame and was rich as shit. Thats enough to be attractive to most women like today but he was far from a sex symbol. Yoko even back then was mostly seen as a pretentious crazy hack (which she was).

You want sex symbols look at Brigitte Bardot, Jeanne Moreau, Sophia Loren, Gina Lollobridgida , .....etc. the list goes on Incredible attractive women and all that without plastic surgery.

 

[PaleMoonlight]

Obviously you were trying to be funny, but the 'joke' is premeditated on the assumption that women need largely unnecessary cleaning products for their privates for them not to be 'gross' before they get banged by chads like yourself. 'It's just a joke, bro' doesn't give you some sort of immunity shield from criticism.

I generally don't use the term incel, because it's become a catch-all inflammatory term, but it seemed pretty apt for the situation. And it's really not more eye-rolling than addressing someone as 'my guy'.

No offense but it sounds like you’re the incel that can’t take a joke. LMAO!

 

[GSP_37]

The other day at the mall, I saw this short asian, possibly porno actress or stripper, wearing skimpy strap overalls type thing with extreme fake boob sideboob exposure braless. I don't think this type of outfit would be worn long ago.

 

[no fat chicks]

There's never been so many fat out of shape people before.

You've all been duped by filters and a few select hotties.

 

[MidgardSerpent]

No offense but it sounds like you’re the incel that can’t take a joke. LMAO!

You're the exact type of person I described earlier. Frame something as funny, then say something that doesn't even make sense within that context, then usually act like the other party 'doesn't have a life' for not agreeing. An incel's mindset would be diametrically opposed to my original point. If you'd used some other low bar insults like autist or white knight it would have at least fit the situation.

 

[PaleMoonlight]

You're the exact type of person I described earlier. Frame something as funny, then say something that doesn't even make sense within that context, then usually act like the other party 'doesn't have a life' for not agreeing. An incel's mindset would be diametrically opposed to my original point. If you'd used some other low bar insults like autist or white knight it would have at least fit the situation.

Sorry to hear you get offended with jokes. You must be fun at get parties (if you even get invited.) LOL

 

[mozfonky]

Same problem in the UK and I would add LGBT to that. Although, when I look at photos of women from a generation ago, I think the hottest then were as hot as the hottest now. It may seem that the hot women now seem hotter because who they are surrounded by.

I've seen as little as 15-20 pounds turn a woman from a stunner into what looks like the beginnings of just some lady you might see out at the store. It's crazy, us men might have a bit more leeway but even us. I remember being 18 and in great shape and women, nonstop, flirting with me, that all ended overnight when I took a job at a steelmill and ate away my miseries, but I only gained about 35-40 pounds. Heads stopped turning. The extra food doesn't do us any good except to help us salve all the anxiety and pressure that we are forced to deal with.

We have less leisure time and energy too. I told my best friend when he mentioned how he had to lose weight, just honestly told him to forget about it with his lifestyle. It takes a lot of energy and concentration to not eat away your anxieties, without a support system or some help it's just too easy to eat all this fast food and crap.

Back in the pre ww2 days, food wasn't nearly as plentiful, I've read a full quarter of all military recruits were rejected due to malnutrition. Hard to believe but they couldn't even eat enough not to fall underweight and unready to be a troop in 4 weeks.

 

[Renard]

I've seen as little as 15-20 pounds turn a woman from a stunner into what looks like the beginnings of just some lady you might see out at the store. It's crazy, us men might have a bit more leeway but even us. I remember being 18 and in great shape and women, nonstop, flirting with me, that all ended overnight when I took a job at a steelmill and ate away my miseries, but I only gained about 35-40 pounds. Heads stopped turning. The extra food doesn't do us any good except to help us salve all the anxiety and pressure that we are forced to deal with.

We have less leisure time and energy too. I told my best friend when he mentioned how he had to lose weight, just honestly told him to forget about it with his lifestyle. It takes a lot of energy and concentration to not eat away your anxieties, without a support system or some help it's just too easy to eat all this fast food and crap.

Back in the pre ww2 days, food wasn't nearly as plentiful, I've read a full quarter of all military recruits were rejected due to malnutrition. Hard to believe but they couldn't even eat enough not to fall underweight and unready to be a troop in 4 weeks.

It doesn't help that the US never updated its' food policies for modern times. The government still implicitly uses a "prevent starvation" approach to food by subsidizing junk crops with high calories and low nutrition. Americans need the opposite: lower calories, higher nutrition. At this point the multi-national food corporations selling processed foods and the medical complex (insurance companies, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies) involved in treating the lifestyle-related diseases caused by food have become monsters of their own who will also lobby at every opportunity to make sure changes don't get made towards the right direction. Billion-dollar industries with a vested interest in making sure people stay fat and sick.

 

[mozfonky]

It doesn't help that the US never updated its' food policies for modern times. The government still implicitly uses a "prevent starvation" approach to food by subsidizing junk crops with high calories and low nutrition. Americans need the opposite: lower calories, higher nutrition. At this point the multi-national food corporations selling processed foods and the medical complex (insurance companies, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies) involved in treating the lifestyle-related diseases caused by food have become monsters of their own who will also lobby at every opportunity to make sure changes don't get made towards the right direction. Billion-dollar industries with a vested interest in making sure people stay fat and sick.

absolutely, none of that helps, what we call "processed foods" today was pretty much unheard of in earlier times unless you want to count curing and smoking or the like. Poor people eat worse food because the stuff that fills up a person the cheapest is the bad food, but we all eat too much and it's disgusting. All the extra chemicals, the ingredients added for extra flavor all are bad.

If you talk to older people they might tell you how distinctly different food was in their time. A cow raised on corn and all sorts of steroids and a tomato made by companies like monsanto or tampered with in some fashion, it's very different than things done by nature. All in the name of maximizing profit.

 

[650lb Sumo]

Every generation is inferior to the previous, due to the relaxation of natural selection, and something else which I'm not allowed to mention. Mentally, physically, across the board. Including beauty.