I posted: I'm sure you're right, but would you find an equal amount of homicides, assaults, and armed robberies?I pointed out how stop and frisk granted leniency to white people and illogically focused their policing on minorities even when whites where turning up more weapons and drugs when stopped. Then I pointed out that type of disproportionate use of policing/mass incarnation over the course of long time will have negative effects on a minority group.
Then you said something about all black leaders only blamed everything on racism.
And you replied: I Mean who knows? I worked at a bar right off wall street and saw way more hard drug use in the open there with finance industry folks than I ever saw living in Brooklyn with minorities. If the suits were systematically arrested, went to prison, handed records that would bar them from getting their old job back, etc. for generations it's possible.
Again, when one demographic commits more violent crime than another, why would police focus their efforts on the group that commits less crime? That doesn't even make tactical sense.
You again mention that whites in your link were found with more weapons and contraband than minorities. I thought we already worked this out? The police only stopped and frisked whites that acted suspiciously, of course they will find more weapons and contraband of they do that. That was from your own link. And again I'm not saying the stop and frisk policy was right because it obviously is not.
Both yourself and Panamerican continue to focus on drug crimes saying something to the extent of "see, white people have just as much drugs as black people but they get roughed up more by the police, racism! Of the systematic variety!
Meanwhile, minorities (more specifically blacks) commit more violent crime than whites... Yet, according to the data in this thread, the police still kill more whites than they do blacks.
This is why no one takes your systematic racism argument seriously brother. It's a ship with cannonball sized holes in it.