- Joined
- Mar 31, 2008
- Messages
- 43,492
- Reaction score
- 44,055
Lol @Darkballs completely humiliating himself again on behalf of his masters.
The "insanity" plea for geriatric Democrat Presidents. LOL.So the conclusion is he is not mentally fit to be charged.
Not sure what is considered sexually assault. Is feeling up a little girls chest sexual assault.
But he's a Sherdog LOLawyer. How can he be wrong?Lol @Darkballs completely humiliating himself again on behalf of his masters.
Lol @Darkballs completely humiliating himself again on behalf of his masters.
Are you mad? It is literally on camera. Come on over and try to grab and sniff my children. I double dare you.The very fact that you would claim he's sexually assaulted children on camera, is a perfect example of how dishonest you guys are with these "scandals."
But he's a Sherdog LOLawyer. How can he be wrong?
Are you mad? It is literally on camera. Are you mad? It is literally on camera.
Come on over and try to grab and sniff my children. I double dare you.
Come on over and try to grab and sniff my children. I double dare you.
Sorry no charges were filed.
Another one of your predictions that turned out to be dead wrong. Don't worry, the Special Prosecutor threw you a bone. Ride it till the wheels come off.
He's gettin' mad, folks. Don't disrespect the LOLawyer.
Jesus.
You guys are pure trash.
I hear Sam presti could probably get it doneamerica is not ready for cackling kamala. hey you guys can have justin trudeau. canada is offering to trade up their leader in exchange for a 4'th round draft pick and future considerations. though you might be getting hosed on the deal as that seems a little too high of an asking price for him. at least he's not 120 years old, can tie his own shoes, and he probably remembers what day of the week it is, unlike most of the politicians in washington.
In my opinion it sounds like he is incompetent to stand trial based off the quotes.So no actual answer to my question then.
Quit what, LOLawyer man? Oh', you want a false legal statement? How 'bout, "Mishandling classified documents isn't a crime as long as you're a Democrat", or "Not returning mishandled classified documents isn't a crime if you're too senile to remember when you mishandled them?"Damn, you quit and you didn't have even have the stones to tag me.
So according to you it's not. Well that clarifies something .
Quit what, LOLawyer man? Oh', you want a false legal statement? How 'bout, "Mishandling classified documents isn't a crime as long as you're a Democrat", or "Not returning mishandled classified documents isn't a crime if you're too senile to remember when you mishandled them?"
You're an absolute clown, dude. By all means, though, keep talking. Your legal expertise is so valuable.