Using the phrase "regardless of which ones hits" makes it sound like it's a foregeone conclusion that one of the decision props has to hit, rather than the very real possibility that neither one of them hits. To me, this seems like another odd turn of phrase and one in which you're stuck on the end by losing every bet, and not exactly in the middle of anything. That's just my viewpoint, maybe others see it differently, but I'm struggling to understand the concept of middlleing, at least the way you use it.