Economy Democrats have done a demonstrably superior job, during the same period, of managing the economy.

[So Fresh]

Exactly what "proof" do you need? China is on a trajectory to overtake us (with the exception of super advanced technology), and Biden is well known as one of the main players responsible for it.

The only people who don't know this are brainlets.

But I’m saying it’s not well known to me, so instead of explaining and “teaching” me about what you say you are trying to claim some kind of fake superiority which actually makes you look really insecure. Anyway do you bro, i’ll just look it up on wikipedia lol.

 

[So Fresh]

But I’m saying it’s not well known to me, so instead of explaining and “teaching” me about what you say you are trying to claim some kind of fake superiority which actually makes you look really insecure. Anyway do you bro, i’ll just look it up on wikipedia lol.

oh lol you’re already banned

 

[So Fresh]

Didn't hate history. I just don't ignore what is going on in the moment and pretend like we're in good hands because the democrats are in office. They've been attempting to print and waste more money for months now without a care in the world about inflation.

Today's democrats are nothing like the democrats of old.

I’m not saying you should do that, but this thread is about the history of economic policies from both parties not necessarily the democrats/ Biden alone. Since Biden is still in office and his term isn’t over you can’t really judge his performance whole.

 

[boxingskills]

 

[Prutfis]

And he has done it for the entire world. Amazing.

 

[Prutfis]

Nope, i just simply find myself wondering since when you guys started using commie insults, because last time i was checked Sherdog right wingers called everyone a marxist or commie, now they are using commie terms, how the turntables.

You seem to be far behind on this one. American right wingers are now trying to make Nazis left wing socialists. So now, you can actually be a commie-nazi

 

[So Fresh]

You seem to be far behind on this one. American right wingers are now trying to make Nazis left wing socialists. So now, you can actually be a commie-nazi

Haha this is a good one yeah. It just shows how easily they are fooled by names and labels.

“But but but they have socialist in their name”

 

[youngsteinel]

Totes, bro. Shutting down the economy for over a year and printing trillions of dollars was a stroke of genius. Record inflation, the stock market in the shitter, and home price/median income ratio is the worst it's ever been. Yippee, I wish myself and all my dead relatives could vote for Brandon another 20 times.

That was Trump who did that

 

[Fanu]

Democrats suck as much as Republicans do.




You're all getting played.

 

[rob mafia]

Four critical responses to the OP, zero attempts to even try to make anything resembling an argument. Par for the course here these days, unfortunately.

dude...

American right wingers are now trying to make Nazis left wing socialists.

...wait, it's americans who are trying to make the national socialist german workers party... socialists?

 

[Prutfis]

...wait, it's americans who are trying to make the national socialist german workers party... socialists?

Yes. Extremely retarded ones. Are you one of the retards? You certainly are right on que with the "but but they have socialist in their name"

 

[rob mafia]

Yes. Extremely retarded ones. Are you one of the retards? You certainly are right on que with the "but but they have socialist in their name"

name... and practice. but yeah, i'm sure they were just coerced into welfare states and infrastructure and HUGE govt and gun control and etc.

you know, like right-wing capitalists.

 

[Rod1]

Democrats suck as much as Republicans do.

How many of those against votes are Republican vs how many are Democrats?

 

[Rod1]

From Wiki
When the term entered into common use in the 1980s in connection with Augusto Pinochet's economic reforms in Chile, it quickly took on negative connotations and was employed principally by critics of market reform and laissez-faire capitalism. Scholars tended to associate it with the theories of Mont Pelerin Society economists Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman and James M. Buchanan, along with politicians and policy-makers such as Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and Alan Greenspan.[33][34] Once the new meaning of neoliberalism became established as a common usage among Spanish-speaking scholars, it diffused into the English-language study of political economy.[33] By 1994, with the passage of NAFTA and with the Zapatistas' reaction to this development in Chiapas, the term entered global circulation. Scholarship on the phenomenon of neoliberalism has grown over the last few decades.[23][24]

Seems it is a term for laissez-faire capitalism that goes too far. By that I mean puts only profits as important at the cost of everything else.

Its whatever the fuck you need it to be in order to give a slur like tag to something you don't like, ergo why it has never been defined properly.

Hence my criticism of NAFTA and China joining the WTO. But you decided to play this stupid game instead.

China is not a laissez-fare economy, neither is the USA, trade has rules its not a free for all.

Neoliberalism is just a meaningless slur invented by socialists to make them sound smarter than they are and have people not immediatly dismiss their non-sense.

 

[ElKarlo]

Its whatever the fuck you need it to be in order to give a slur like tag to something you don't like, ergo why it has never been defined properly.



China is not a laissez-fare economy, neither is the USA, trade has rules its not a free for all.

Neoliberalism is just a meaningless slur invented by socialists to make them sound smarter than they are and have people not immediatly dismiss their non-sense.

You realize that a country can have an economic that is not the same as the one that’s being practiced in their own country? You seem to be unable to make a coherent point here

 

[HankScorpio]

Let me first say I’m from Europe and although I know the whole trickle down neoliberal/ neocon reaganomics theory was just bullshit and didn’t work there still was a kind of illusion that the republicans we’re the economic and financially responsible party. They we’re the ones who we’re financially conservative and fiscally responsible.

Well it turns out this wasn’t true:




After all this proof I think we can finally stop with the myth that the republicans are the better economic and financially responsible party.

Could this also be the reason that the reps are clamping down so desperately onto the culture wars topics? (And no this is not an invitation to turn this into another culture war thread).

you can read the rest of the piece here:
https://newrepublic.com/article/166...=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1651986163

The problem with this analysis is calculating recession and depression as events with clear start and end dates. These events are snowflakes on the top of the mountain, during one administration and become an avalanche several presidents later. Using 2008, that recession started in the 70's.

 

[Rod1]

You realize that a country can have an economic that is not the same as the one that’s being practiced in their own country? You seem to be unable to make a coherent point here

Hard to make a point when someone is bringing catch-words into the mix.

 

[jeremyemilio]

Let me first say I’m from Europe and although I know the whole trickle down neoliberal/ neocon reaganomics theory was just bullshit and didn’t work there still was a kind of illusion that the republicans we’re the economic and financially responsible party. They we’re the ones who we’re financially conservative and fiscally responsible.

Well it turns out this wasn’t true:




After all this proof I think we can finally stop with the myth that the republicans are the better economic and financially responsible party.

Could this also be the reason that the reps are clamping down so desperately onto the culture wars topics? (And no this is not an invitation to turn this into another culture war thread).

you can read the rest of the piece here:
https://newrepublic.com/article/166...=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1651986163

This is all pretty old news, to be honest.

 

[ElKarlo]

Hard to make a point when someone is bringing catch-words into the mix.

Yea saying neoliberal is some sort of catch word
Sorry that you’re unable to debate.

 

[Rod1]

Yea saying neoliberal is some sort of catch word
Sorry that you’re unable to debate.

Claiming that "neoliberalism" is the root of the rise of China is imbecilic considering how China rise had absolutely nothing to do with "neoliberalism" but Chinese implementation of market reforms that were also adopted at different times by Japan, Korea, Taiwan.