Social Do you realize your ancestors were black?

Levi_

Silver Belt
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
11,367
Reaction score
2,294
The story of human skin color, specifically the evolution of light skin, offers a stark illustration of how recent certain adaptations are in the grand tapestry of human and hominid history. The Homo genus is believed to have emerged around 2.5 million years ago, with Homo sapiens, our own species, making its appearance roughly 300,000 years ago. For the vast majority of this timeline, humans and their hominid ancestors inhabited regions with varying degrees of UV radiation, sporting dark skin as a protective adaptation against the sun's intense rays. This trait was crucial for safeguarding folate levels, essential for DNA replication and repair, and for protecting against UV-induced damage.

The shift towards lighter skin pigmentation, as recent discoveries suggest, occurred astonishingly late in the course of human history. It was only around 8,000 years ago that genes associated with lighter skin, such as SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, began to spread rapidly among European populations, propelled by the migration and interbreeding between Near Eastern farmers and indigenous European hunter-gatherers. This adaptation was driven by the need to maximize vitamin D synthesis in regions of lower sunlight exposure.

When placed in the context of the Homo genus's existence and even the narrower timeframe of Homo sapiens's history, the last 8,000 years represent but a brief moment. To quantify, the period during which light skin has been a common trait in some human populations is less than 3% of the existence of Homo sapiens and a mere 0.32% of the Homo genus's timeline. This perspective underscores how dynamic and responsive human evolution is to changing environments, even within what, on an evolutionary scale, could be considered a blink of an eye.

Moreover, this brief period has seen significant cultural, technological, and societal advancements, from the development of agriculture to the rise of civilizations, and more recently, the technological boom of the last few centuries. Yet, despite these rapid changes, the genetic adaptations we carry, such as those for lighter skin in certain populations, are a reminder of our species' long journey through a variety of environments and the relatively recent nature of our current genetic makeup.

In summary, the evolution of light skin is a testament to the recentness of some human adaptations in the grand scheme of our history. It highlights the importance of viewing human diversity and traits through the lens of evolutionary biology, recognizing the profound impact of environmental changes on our species' development over time.
 
It's not only skin color that changed. People in cold areas with less sun and more snow begun to learn to hoard food and other essentials, giving them delayed gratification and also work together better to take down larger animals for food for survival during seasons where there's nothing else to eat
 
It's not only skin color that changed. People in cold areas with less sun and more snow begun to learn to hoard food and other essentials, giving them delayed gratification and also work together better to take down larger animals for food for survival during seasons where there's nothing else to eat
Does this theory even make sense though? Two of the most advanced old civilisations, Egypt and Babylon, are in warm climates. Europe became civilised like 3,000 years later.
 
Does this theory even make sense though? Two of the most advanced old civilisations, Egypt and Babylon, are in warm climates. Europe became civilised like 3,000 years later.
That "delayed gratification" bit was subtly about how some people have impulse control.
 
Does this theory even make sense though? Two of the most advanced old civilisations, Egypt and Babylon, are in warm climates. Europe became civilised like 3,000 years later.

Also Greece and Rome would be exceptions.
 
Does this theory even make sense though? Two of the most advanced old civilisations, Egypt and Babylon, are in warm climates. Europe became civilised like 3,000 years later.

Its not the only factor but it is a huge factor

 
Its not the only factor but it is a huge factor


IDK dude. In fact I find that ancient civilisations all happened in warm climates. If you count Greece and Rome as warm (which I do not think is the case though as it gets chilly in winter over there) then you need to wait until like what, the 8th century and the Franks for the first kingdom worth a shit in Northern Yurrp?

I mean I do get the theory and it makes sense but it does fly in the face of historical evidence IMO.
 
IDK dude. In fact I find that ancient civilisations all happened in warm climates. If you count Greece and Rome as warm (which I do not think is the case though as it gets chilly in winter over there) then you need to wait until like what, the 8th century and the Franks for the first kingdom worth a shit in Northern Yurrp?

I mean I do get the theory and it makes sense but it does fly in the face of historical evidence IMO.
I've noticed he seems pretty committed to the white superiority idea so good luck on this one.
 
Back
Top