I really enjoyed it. Villeneuve is awesome.
Clear 8.5/10 for me.
I've never seen the Lynch film all through and the parts I had seen were so long ago that it was really as though I were going into this film with a clean slate. But what I find strange is I saw more than one headline where a critic wrote a piece indicating the Lynch film was the superior movie, or, at least, the more enjoyable film. I'm thinking to myself- by what metrics? This seemed like it was probably superior in virtually every category. Even with my fuzzy memory of what I'd seen from it, I can at least say that this was way more impressive to me.
What a cast they assembled for this. I love Bardem in virtually every role I've seen him in. Just one of those distinctive, idiosyncratic actors that you've got to appreciate. This was no exception. I thought he did a great job in creating an aura around his character.
But a lot of this movie fell on Chalamet's and Ferguson's shoulders as they had the most screentime. I thought they both did really well and were particularly convincing in the mother-son bond, which I thought would be a tough sell since Ferg strikes me as far too young to be Chalamet's mother but they pulled it off very well.
Oscar Isaac- always a boss. Brolin, solid. Momoa was a lot of fun. Zendaya had a lot of presence and will, I'm sure, play a major factor in the sequel. Would have liked to see more of Big Dave, but he always does a quality job even in smaller parts.
But, really, the cinematography, direction, set design, costumes, etc were the greatest standouts. Awesome world-building.