- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 62,004
- Reaction score
- 16,721
Featuring Bruce Willis as "Fed Up Old Man in a handful of scenes."Challenge:
Name one current major hollywood actor that is more consistently typecast than Jason Momoa.
Featuring Bruce Willis as "Fed Up Old Man in a handful of scenes."Challenge:
Name one current major hollywood actor that is more consistently typecast than Jason Momoa.
I think Rian Johnson would do this better.
They are Budislamics, specifically the Zensunni branch. But to say they are a specific current ethnic group is sort of silly since Dune takes place some 20k years in the future. In the books the religion was a fusion of Sunni Islam and Zen Buddhism so they could plausibly be any mix of north african, middle eastern, and east asian.
They are Budislamics, specifically the Zensunni branch. But to say they are a specific current ethnic group is sort of silly since Dune takes place some 20k years in the future. In the books the religion was a fusion of Sunni Islam and Zen Buddhism so they could plausibly be any mix of north african, middle eastern, and east asian.
Yeah, my memory of the Dune books is a fog at this point. I just vaguely remember something about a diaspora regarding the Fremen. Like, them settling the desert planet of Arrakis being analogous (in a symbolic sense) to the Israelites 40 year trek through the desert.
Too many big name stars in this movie
Seeing Jason Momoa and Dave Bautista cast originally had me worried that they were going to make this a cheesy blockbuster film, but the director, writers and producers look really good; Momoa and Bautista have also been put in roles I think fits their personalities well. Only thing I don't get is casting Zendaya. Her acting is just awful and to my knowledge she has never done any work that has an atmosphere that isn't geared towards kids. I hope she pulls it off, but damn they could have put literally anyone else in there
I read Messiah recently and found it to be a rather lackluster follow up. It wasn't bad, but after the first book which was grand in scope but still had disciplined writing, Messiah while much shorter seemed to me to have a lot of superfluous nonsense, particularly as related to Paul and his continual mind wanderings or whatever you'd called them. Everything about it was just not quite as good as the first imo, including the villains, although the face-dancer was a good character. Glad to hear the third book is a return to from.Yes I think it very much does, exploring the ideas setup in the original to their conclusion with God Emperor being more an extended coda on that conclusion that you could probably infer from the previous books or get via synopsis.
Quality wise I think Messiah feels slightly rushed relative to the original but it does have an interesting atmosphere to it, Children though I think returns to the same standard as the original albeit more akin to the second half in terms of complexity, no coincidence Hebert spent longer on it than any of the other sequels.
Agreed. Skarskgard as the baron is my favorite casting so far. Rampling as the reverend mother, and Bardem as Stilgar are good picks as well.The start of Blade Runner 2049 tells me Bastia should be fine playing a ruthless hard ass, if anything that seems like the most perfect casting to be along with the Baron.
Messiah is very much an interlude. When Sci-Fi did their miniseries adaptions they compressed the whole thing into one episode to start off their Children of Dune series.I read Messiah recently and found it to be a rather lackluster follow up. It wasn't bad, but after the first book which was grand in scope but still had disciplined writing, Messiah while much shorter seemed to me to have a lot of superfluous nonsense, particularly as related to Paul and his continual mind wanderings or whatever you'd called them. Everything about it was just not quite as good as the first imo, including the villains, although the face-dancer was a good character. Glad to hear the third book is a return to from.
I get that, but for such a short book it seemed to have an awful lot of unnecessary text, along with a general decline in writing quality imoMessiah is very much an interlude.
It's a travestyWas the original movie worth watching?
I read Messiah recently and found it to be a rather lackluster follow up. It wasn't bad, but after the first book which was grand in scope but still had disciplined writing, Messiah while much shorter seemed to me to have a lot of superfluous nonsense, particularly as related to Paul and his continual mind wanderings or whatever you'd called them. Everything about it was just not quite as good as the first imo, including the villains, although the face-dancer was a good character. Glad to hear the third book is a return to from..
I think Dune is a lot like Lord of the Rings personally, it demands a cast with a lot of screen presense to bring character to it or risk the story becoming too dry.
The start of Blade Runner 2049 tells me Batista should be fine playing a ruthless hard ass, if anything that seems like the most perfect casting to me along with the Baron.