Romero did not beat izzy, not even close. He should have gotten the win over whitaker though easy and the costa fight was debatable
I would reverse the decision that MMA needs judges.
MMA doesn't need judges.
The only way to win is stoppage and every fight that goes the distance is always a draw, because if both fighters are still willing and able to fight there simply is no winner.
This way the sport is pure and fight records are always 100% clear, since there are no gift wins or stupid decisions by stupid judges.
The judges have to go just like the people who think MMA needs judges.
Basing opinions on significant strikes numbers is so 2019.You poor sad lad, watch the 3rd round again, then look at the stats specifically the significant strikes. Lastly come back chastened and admit what an egregious error you've made. And for the record there's zero argument to be made that Max won the 4th or 5th rounds.
Oh yeah, remember that one ... Jeeeez, I really wanna have those substances that let you view the world in such terms that make you argue why Sanchez won that fight.Diego Sanchez vs. Martin Kampmann.
that one should have clearly been a draw.BJ vs GSP 1.
I felt BJ did enough to get the nod in that one.
It was a close fight. could have gone either way. i thought Romero edged it but neither fighter should have been confident going into the decision. Thing is, Romero could have won it outright if he wrestled more. strange fightI was there live. The crowd overwhelmingly booed the decision. As I was walking out I was keeping my eyes open for any Adesanya fans celebrating. Oddly, none, almost as if they were ashamed of him getting it (like I was when GSP got the nod he didn't deserve).
Surveys done since also confirmed that most people had Romero winning, as the TS showed, so "not even close" is your biased opinion.
should have been a draw.Bj vs GSP 1.
Kevin Randleman vs Bas Rutten.
The judges were clearly biased towards Bas.