Revisions.
The Five Modes of Gender.
The first mode of gender is the soul. The soul is the supernatural ethereal consciousness. There are male and female souls. The second mode of gender is the body. The body includes the body, brain, and DNA. There are male and bodies. The third mode of gender is expression. Expressions like stoicism, rage, wearing pants, acting like a geek, acting like a tough guy, and liking sports, are masculine expressions. Expressions like acting dainty, wearing dresses, caring about fashion, and liking dance are feminine expressions. The fourth mode of gender is power. Power is what you can do in the world. Powers like seducing women, acquiring resources through work, and military strength are masculine powers. Powers like seducing men, birthing and rearing children, and homemaking are feminine powers. The fifth mode of gender is birthright. Birthright is what society bestows upon you. Birthrights like being the head of a household in a marriage are masculine birthrights while birthrights like not being drafted to go into war are feminine birthrights.
In the past the five modes of gender were associated with each other. Meaning, a masculine mode below would contribute to a masculine mode above. A male soul would have a male body. A male soul and body would then display masculine expressions. Male souls, bodies, and expressions were useful in exerting masculine power. Male souls, bodies, expressions, and power were rewarded by society. Similarly A female souls and body would display feminine expressions. Female, souls, bodies, and expressions were useful in exerting feminine power. Female souls, bodies, expressions, and power were rewarded by society. Now let us examine if there are still these same associations today.
Regarding the association of body with soul there is still a strong association. We know that God puts the correct type of soul in the correct type of body so there could not be a mistake of a wrongly gendered soul going into a wrongly gendered body. Additionally, we can determine if a body is male or female by the presence or absence of an active Y chromosome, or the pattern on the skin, so there could not be a situation where a gendered soul is put into a non gendered body. Changing the body so that it no longer matches the gender of the soul has failed as transgenders do not have realistic bodies of the gender they are trying to emulate.
Regarding the association of expression with body and soul there is a weak association. Men do not act like men and women do not act like women. Men have weak, inept, and not put together. Women have become oafish and competitive.
Regarding the association of power, with expression, body, and soul, there is a weak association for men and a semi strong association for women. In today's age because of technology a masculine body is no longer any more useful in things like combat, construction, agriculture. Shooting guns or piloting tanks and planes do not require that much strength or stamina. Excavators, tractors, pumps, and power tools make large scale construction projects or farming possible for the weaker female body. Additionally the structure of the male soul and the wiring of the male brain, do not give off an advantage in acquiring masculine prestige in business. Acquiring resources is not about reaction times, spatial reasoning, or finding quick fixes, it is about general intelligence, specifically in academic settings which the female brain and soul is sufficient at. Masculine gender expressions, are also not required to have these sorts of successes. Again intelligence or ability at operating technology is the most important, not acting like a tough guy. Geeks who obsess over nerdy stuff do not necessarily have a higher pattern recognition or active memory ability than women who obsess over makeup. In the past the geeks driven passion and other qualities would have helped then in academic settings, but now women without the passion but with higher intelligences can easily out compete them. In some cases this is a bit of a hyperbole because we know that even in modern warfare and business men the first three masculine modes of gender still have an advantage over the feminine ones, but the advantage is very slim. The masculine body still has power to seduce women, but that is only really for the most attractive of men. For women, a female body is still required to give birth and thus has reproductive power. Additionally, their bodies can be used to seduce men. However, there is disassociation with the feminine expression and the feminine power. In the past a more well put together and feminine women who acted dainty was more likely to attract rich, powerful, or attractive men than one who was not. However, now men have become very much slovenly and do not appreciate femininity, instead they only desire the female body and care not for the female expression preferring she act as “one of the guys.” With regard to man attracting, there is functionally no difference between wearing a floral dress and walking gracefully, and wearing sweatpants and walking clumsily.
Regarding the association of birthright, with power, expression, body, and soul there is a semi weak association for men and women. Masculine power like being able to make money is still very much rewarded by society, but masculine expressions, bodies, or souls do not get special benefits. In the case of women feminine power and expressions are not rewarded by society and are seen by society at large as trivial. Though, feminine bodies and souls are still rewarded with special privileges like not having to be called to go fight in wars, as well as women only spaces and networks.
It is in the interest of the right wing to reassociate the five modes of gender with each other. However, in my opinion the current right wing has tunnel vision only on the disassociation of the soul with the body, and the dissociation of the expression with the body and the soul. With regards to transgenderism, there is no actual threat to dissociation because transgenderism does not work. However, the right wing should be commended for educating the public on these failures and keeping many from falling into a pit of lies. With regards to complaining about men not acting like men and women not acting like women, as well as preaching and practicing alpha male behavior with the hope that it will lead to positive impacts on ones life, the right wing fails to recognize that the five modes rely on each other to succeed. By not focusing on the disassociation with respect to power and birthright, they fight a lost cause.
Below are my solutions for reassociating the five modes.
Regarding the reassociation of body with soul, the current strategy being employed by the right wing is all that is needed. The soul and body are not disassociated from each other and reminding the public of that by rebuking transgenderism is all that is needed.
Regarding the reassociation of expression with body and soul, my manifestos man making and women making school education programs should help remedy the situation. Additionally the dress codes found in my manifesto should also help. It might be wise to bar women from wearing pants, shorts, and fold over collars and men from wearing dresses or skirts. Women who have to wear pants for some sort of job might have to apply for a pants permit. Additionally social pressure that cause conformity among gender expressions should also be increased.
Regarding the reassociation of power with expression, body, and soul, the problem facing the loss of men’s power requires action on four fronts in my estimation, with the problem facing the loss of women’s power requiring action on one. Women’s success and ability in blue collar type jobs usurps the association of the masculine as the provider. Thus, the providing powers that women gain from working these jobs must be transferred to men. In order to do this the government should allow men who are having trouble fitting the role of a family provider to request certain services to help them out. The government should then force blue collar women to use their skills to help these men. Women’s success and ability in white collar type jobs usurps the association of the masculine as having high status and influence. Thus, the status and influence that women gain from working these jobs must be transferred to men. In order to do this the government should tax white collar women’s earning at an additional rate of ten percent. This money should then be transferred to male community leaders for their own spending. Additionally, for women working in both white and blue collar fields, their clothing style can have an effect on usurpation. If a women dresses in a feminine way, it usurps the masculine expression, but if a women dresses in a masculine way, is usurps the masculine body. To limit the fall out, each year, working women should have to pick one clothing expression that they can wear for that year. Either a feminine expression, or a more "business professional" expression. Completely dressing like a man will obviously be prohibited for the reasons described above. Women’s success and ability in combat at arms usurps the association of the masculine as the warrior. Thus, the bravery of women engaged in these activities must be transferred to men. In order to do this the government should make a tally of anytime a women in the military or police does anything brave or impressive in combat. All of these women must then attend a camp where overly effeminate or flamboyant men will be brought. The women will train these men in combat, then these men will be sent to patrol the ghettos. Men and women’s promiscuity has allowed people to have sex with whomever they want whenever they want without any fear. Because men naturally have no problem having sex with women who are a little ugly, the most attractive men will have sex with pretty much all of the women leaving nothing for the rest of the men. Only by restricting the amount of women the most attractive men can have sex with, can women be forced to have sex with ugly men. This should be done by society shaming premarital sex. This will increase the seductive power of masculinity because now most men will have the ability to seduce women. Men’s distaste for art and finery has caused the feminine to loose its seductive power. Thus men must be educated to have less crass and gauche tastes.
Regarding the reassociation of birthright with power, expression, body, and soul, most of the problems related to the loss of birthright should be automatically corrected with the reassociation of the other modes. However, allowing gender specific social groups would also be beneficial.
