- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Messages
- 13,273
- Reaction score
- 7,579
It was "Nassourdine Imavov" who brought Sean Strickland close to a fight for the belt. Dolidze first had to meet Cannonier, who started the fight. Cannonier is in position #4. As for Dolidze, I posted his videos. No one has shut him down, and if he even loses, it is in close fights, by decision. The logic of the author of the topic that this is a bad fight is absolutely illogical. Maybe he just doesn't know something. Those who undermine Dolidze's forces, give me 1 battle where he was completely oppressed, and then let's talk. Sean Strickland, if Nassourdine Imavov has the right to be considered the main contender after his defeat, why doesn't Dolidze have the right? UFC sees Dolidze's potential and that's why they gave him to Branson, Cannonier... and other fighters.
The thread asks if these are the two lowest ranked fighters to be involved in a main event, since neither of them is ranked top10 worlwide, and even barely top 15 (Imavov is not). It's not that I agree or disagree with such standings, just an objective observation.
"The worst fight" was just an easy way to type it out. Obviously isnt worse than some WMMA main events in terms of skill.
On another note, I dont get what you say that "Dolidze had to fight Cannonier". He didnt. But definitely did way worse vs a common opponent in Vettori.
He didnt fight Brunson neither, who btw I think would have been a very tough match up for Dolidze's and his spotty striking defense