- Joined
- Mar 7, 2017
- Messages
- 6,826
- Reaction score
- 3,727
Much harder . I wouldn’t say judo practices are harder than wrestling practices though . I’ll take the wrestling room practices at Univ of Iowa over the kodokan any day .
I found Judo WAY more difficult to learn than BJJ. My conclusion is that Judo requires more timing and coordination to perform (tachiwaza).
Also, it is easier to experiment with ground techniques. If you fail, no big deal. You tap. When you fail at Judo standing techniques, you hit the mat hard.
I did Judo twice a week for a year. I lost my fear of falling. But, I suck at throws. I guess that was worth it.
I found Judo WAY more difficult to learn than BJJ. My conclusion is that Judo requires more timing and coordination to perform (tachiwaza).
Also, it is easier to experiment with ground techniques. If you fail, no big deal. You tap. When you fail at Judo standing techniques, you hit the mat hard.
I did Judo twice a week for a year. I lost my fear of falling. But, I suck at throws. I guess that was worth it.
This is nonsense. Sambo allows both, and you see more footsweeps, forward throws, and trips than singles and doubles. It's hard to attack the legs with your hands when someone has a grip on your clothing, and you have to relinquish your own grip to attempt it.Judo sucks and doesn’t work as well, overly relies on gi grips. Once you learn the artificially complicated moves with names you will never remember you need a bad opponent making mistakes to use them. Put a wrestler in a gi and he can defend an experienced Judo players attacks without much problem and the Judo play will get taken down again and again with leg attacks.
Not always.Judo sucks and doesn’t work as well, overly relies on gi grips. Once you learn the artificially complicated moves with names you will never remember you need a bad opponent making mistakes to use them. Put a wrestler in a gi and he can defend an experienced Judo players attacks without much problem and the Judo play will get taken down again and again with leg attacks.
I found Judo WAY more difficult to learn than BJJ. My conclusion is that Judo requires more timing and coordination to perform (tachiwaza).
Also, it is easier to experiment with ground techniques. If you fail, no big deal. You tap. When you fail at Judo standing techniques, you hit the mat hard.
I did Judo twice a week for a year. I lost my fear of falling. But, I suck at throws. I guess that was worth it.
I know a bunch of people will say no no no but IMO wrestling is more physical and less technical than judo. That's why it's so effective and why wrestlers are so hard to deal with.
Wrestling involves more forward attacks than judo and less turning/off balancing.
Bullshit. Most of the time anyone was shooting double and singles in judo comps was because the guys didn't worry much about those and didn't even keep a stance.Judo sucks and doesn’t work as well, overly relies on gi grips. Once you learn the artificially complicated moves with names you will never remember you need a bad opponent making mistakes to use them. Put a wrestler in a gi and he can defend an experienced Judo players attacks without much problem and the Judo play will get taken down again and again with leg attacks.
I heard though that Kodokan is good but Judo universities in japan practices are 100 times harderMuch harder . I wouldn’t say judo practices are harder than wrestling practices though . I’ll take the wrestling room practices at Univ of Iowa over the kodokan any day .
Yes, wrestling is more size and weight dependent also.I think the gi is a big factor in why judo (and sambo) takedowns end up being more technically complex than wrestling takedowns. The grips allow you to utilize positions that feel counter-intuitive to most people. You may not feel structurally sound in some judo attacks, but it's OK because you have a dominant grip and your opponent is either carrying your weight or about to go for a ride. In most wrestling techniques it's easier to feel that you have control over your opponent.