- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 25,421
- Reaction score
- 39,645
You know the answer. Come on sir.If she wasn’t pretty would she still have the job?
You know the answer. Come on sir.If she wasn’t pretty would she still have the job?
She wouldn't have gotten it in the first placeIf she wasn’t pretty would she still have the job?
No, and rightfully so in this line of workIf she wasn’t pretty would she still have the job?
She wouldn't have gotten it in the first place
he just mad cos She never quit in her fight like he did against cowboy
He still mad.Well its not like she ever fought anyone good enough to have the chance to quit against
Every commentator does that.I don't need to hear what the fighters are supposed to be doing, what they might be doing next, what they could be doing, what kind of effect you think those leg kicks are having, ect.
Or he just has an option that you don’t like the way he was straight forward about it. Varner has always been a prick. This is nothing new, and we have all known this since day 1He still mad.
HE MAD.
TRUEVarner has always been a prick. This is nothing new, and we have all known this since day 1
he just mad cos She never quit in her fight like he did against cowboy
not reallyVarner being champion>>>Sanko having a 1-0 record against a 2-11 fighter.
Rogan knows more about the sport than most fighters and is the best at describing what’s going on. Anik wasn’t a fighter either yet no one says anything about himThe stench of incel in here is already overwhelming.
I'm going to assume that Professor Varner has kept his opinions consistent and has gone on twitter tirades about Rogan never having fought MMA (unlike Sanko).
I haven't paid much attention to her commentary, but she can't possibly be worse than DC, Cruz, Bisping and Rogan.