- Joined
- Mar 4, 2023
- Messages
- 5,385
- Reaction score
- 8,734
AFAIK, no butt cracks were mentioned or displayed. Investigation to be continued.Does it mention the butt crack? That's a public crime by itself.
AFAIK, no butt cracks were mentioned or displayed. Investigation to be continued.Does it mention the butt crack? That's a public crime by itself.
I have and I have consistently said something along the lines of “the evidence that we have now” … The report stops just shy of ruling out any physical assault, and has him cursing two people out. Keep in mind the most telling statement is the lack there of, from the 3rd party, based off of what we currently know. Who witnesses a woman reasonably fear for her safety in the presence of a UFC HW champ and has yet to corroborate her story? And why did her boss advise her not to press charges. I am trying to objectively weigh the evidence of what she recorded but the responses from her colleague and boss, plus Jon's home surveillance evidence heavily outweigh her claim.
Jones will lawyer up
There will be a settlement
Jones will still fight Stipe
Might win and then retire
Humanity at its finest
AFAIK, no butt cracks were mentioned or displayed. Investigation to be continued.
Wait, is that right? Jon grabs HER phone and records himself threatening her and then gives it back and then she takes it to cops? Jon does some stupid shit but if that's true, it might set a new recordThe police report says that the officer saw the video on her cell phone that jones filmed, which backs up her story.
My FIRST comment on PAGE 22Our criminal justice system is based on innocent until proven guilty. We shouldn’t have to blindly insert an assault, or reasonable fear of an assault. Yet nothing in our best piece of evidence suggests an assault or reasonable fear of an assault, had just taken place. Unless there’s some visual proof suggesting otherwise, law enforcement should rely heavily on this footage, which contradicts a logical notion that an assault had just taken place.
See my FIRST comment on page 22. I even underlined it for you.
CB - assault requires NO Physical Contact at all. Mentioning that people die for doing what someone just did at your residence fits the "assault" legal definition.
No, you need to get lost! What did my first comment on page 22 say?"physical assault" lmao dude you seriously need to get lost.
Assault is NOT PHYSICAL. That is BATTERY. Both are crimes.
Get F'n Real. Those Vids Have Never Been Shown, just Jon's BS phone cover-up after he took her phone. Why TF did he take her phone from her while doing her
Read this, if capable. This explains more than you'll Ever Hear from Jon.
The only thing that proves is the part of her story where he said “here’s crystal and Jerome”. It’s a piece of her story. It’s not the part with the death threat though.Wait, is that right? Jon grabs HER phone and records himself threatening her and then gives it back and then she takes it to cops? Jon does some stupid shit but if that's true, it might set a new record
I could be a .35 and still nail a high five and walk decent enough if adrenaline was flowing. Hitting a high five is absolutely NOT proof.I get the people not wanting to give Jon the benefit of the doubt given his history, but it’s wild to me people are still taking the story completely at face value despite the video.
Like disregarding the high five entirely, she claimed he was so intoxicated he thought it was early and not mid afternoon. The video shows he’s not shit faced at all. Literally nobody would even know he’s even been drinking here if he himself hadn’t admitted he was in the middle of celebrating a friends birthday. He seems completely fine, and hitting the high five just fine yes absolutely would count as proof he’s not as drunk as she’s claiming as any legal arguments would count it as demonstrating motor skills.
I don’t know know how you possibly can honestly still believe the story as is. At the very least you need to have scaled back to say there’s some elements of it that may be true, but the initial version is clearly horseshit.
"physical assault" lmao dude you seriously need to get lost.
Assault is NOT PHYSICAL. That is BATTERY. Both are crimes.
Another slap on the wrist incoming for Teflon Jon.
At this point he has to actually kill someone to face any sort of consequences.
Went back & read it again, my post wasn't made to be an insult. If you have twisted knickers from it that's on you.See my first comment on page 22, if you’re not just a bitch ass instigator, and see if I covered a reasonable fear of bodily harm.
That ,or Endeavor spends billions on Trump's reelection campaign so Daddy Dana can get Jones pardoned based on his obvious case of PTSD for all the slanderous incidences Jon has had to endure.no i dont think so. i think if he kills somebody it would be the first time that he made such a mistake/killed a person. another slap on the wrist is justified.
That ,or Endeavor spends billions on Trump's reelection campaign so Daddy Dana can get Jones pardoned based on his obvious case of PTSD for all the slanderous incidences Jon has had to endure.