washedupmeathead
White Belt
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2022
- Messages
- 107
- Reaction score
- 112
I am pretty sure this comes from the fact that 1g per pound is the easiest of all possible values to remember. There is an aspect of scientism as well because it uses precise quantitative values and then couple all that with humans have a massive bias towards round numbers.
I mean just the idea there would be an exact linear relationship between body weight and protein intake is absurd and it just happens to be that the easiest equation to remember is the physically optimal amount.
In reality it is an unfalsifiable claim. I would imagine it overshoots any possible target and we just aren't able to measure the difference between .8 and 1 gram per lb. What are we measuring again? That part is kind of left open ended as well so whatever your goal/target is, 1g per lb is "optimal".
I mean just the idea there would be an exact linear relationship between body weight and protein intake is absurd and it just happens to be that the easiest equation to remember is the physically optimal amount.
In reality it is an unfalsifiable claim. I would imagine it overshoots any possible target and we just aren't able to measure the difference between .8 and 1 gram per lb. What are we measuring again? That part is kind of left open ended as well so whatever your goal/target is, 1g per lb is "optimal".
1 g of protein per pound of weight is bodybuilding philosophy. It's not the requirement for fighting sports or just health. It's to gain stage muscles.