- Joined
- May 14, 2004
- Messages
- 9,371
- Reaction score
- 5,327
Because Staffies are the foundation of APBTs and there are 4 very closely related breeds. Bully is a generic term that covers a lot of ground.Yeah, APBT's, Staffie's, Bully's, all seem like they're cut from the same cloth.
I have been thinking there is more to this story then has come out so far
Dogs don't attack for no reason. Something set them off.
The big problem with pits is not they are more aggressive its once they are set off by something they are very destructive due to their strength and determination.
I also think it's a little bit funny how people nitpick exactly what a pitbull is. "That's not a Pitbull, it's a Pitbull mixed with a Staffordshire Terrier!"
Okay, we get it. Somebody mixed their ultra aggressive landshark with a bigger landshark to get a really big ultra aggressive landshark.
lol wtf? Is being a member on sherdog an Olympic event for you?I love how sherdoggers are AKA certified breed experts...
To believe this you have to believe that that selective breeding doesn’t include behavioral traits or that genetics don’t play a role in behavioral traits. Pretty much you have to not believe in genetics. Or that pit bulls weren’t bred with traits that promoted fighting. I don’t understand any of these opinions.
Pit bulls were selectively bred into existence to win fights and breeders didn’t just select physical traits. They also sleceted the behavioral traits which help the fighting cause. This obviously included things like aggression since you know, aggression lends itself to fighting. Why do pit bulls bite and hang on to maim and kill while other breds bite and let go as a warning? Another selective behavioral that was chosen.
I don't think you read my post.
Yes pits were breed to fight by modern breeders. Fight dogs not people.
They are or can be agresive and hard to control.
They were never breed to be people aggressive just dog aggressive.
I think it would be interesting if somebody conducted a study to determine what traits pitbull owners possess that attract them to the most dangerous dog breed. From what I've seen, there are two distinct groups. One group that loves how dangerous and badass they are, and another group that feels like they are just misunderstood and their heart bleeds for the plight of the breed.
Yes some moron who doesn't know what they are doing with a high prey drive breed and mixing them with other inbred bully breeds, What could go wrong? No one would simply mix a pitbull with a staffy, it would be other bigger breeds like the Am Bulldog, mastiffs ect. That's the dangerous part. Pitbulls are essentially roided out jack Russel terriers and when you put that sort of prey drive in the body of a mastiff, mix in some terrible ownership and inbreeding you end up with retarded dogs that are akin to a loaded AK-47.
Also a lot of the stats are garbage because most people don't even know what a fucking pitbull is and they get wrongfully piled up where they don't belong.
Im with you in that these dogs are and can be dangerous but people like you who only look at the breed are very dangerous for this dialogue because you do nothing to help the situation. Sitting there screaming "PITS ARE DANGEROUS HUR DUR" fix absolutely nothing.
Oh and btw this is a fully grown staffy.
This is a full grown pitbull.....like what a REAL pitbull is supposed to be
This is the dog that mauled the woman
Yea there's a fucking difference.
They are a dog, expecting them to only be aggressive towards one mammal is giving them waaaaayyy to much credit in the intelligence department. Obviously the aggression bleeds over to people all the time.
Pits were also bred for human neutrality originally, and were culled accordingly. It's a description in their breed standard according to some sources and they rate high on temperament testing.To believe this you have to believe that that selective breeding doesn’t include behavioral traits or that genetics don’t play a role in behavioral traits. Pretty much you have to not believe in genetics. Or that pit bulls weren’t bred with traits that promoted fighting. I don’t understand any of these opinions.
Pit bulls were selectively bred into existence to win fights and breeders didn’t just select physical traits. They also sleceted the behavioral traits which help the fighting cause. This obviously included things like aggression since you know, aggression lends itself to fighting. Why do pit bulls bite and hang on to maim and kill while other breds bite and let go as a warning? Another selected behavior that was chosen because it wins fights. It also leads kids to die horrific deaths being eaten alive.
Why anyone thinks it’s a good idea to keep a breed of animal bred into existence to maim and kill other large animals as pets and keep them around kids and other people is beyond me. Very stupid.
That doesnt hold up because what people tend to refer to generically as 'pit bulls' very often tend to be, of pitbull stock. If someone cross bred a Chihuahua with any other rat dog, its still a rat dog and you arent gonna find too many people arguing about the terminology of some little loud ass ankle biter. Would it make you feel better if the media referred to them as 'pit type dog' or large canidae of pit like size, temperment, and appearance?Because Staffies are the foundation of APBTs and there are 4 very closely related breeds. Bully is a generic term that covers a lot of ground.
To the guys mocking those of us who give a damn about breed standards -
Do you guys know what a Chihuahua is and roughly how big they are?
If so, what would be your reaction in people kept calling 30lbs dogs Chihuahuas?
Because just as there's no such a thing as a 30lbs example of the smallest breed, there's no such a thing as a 125lbs pit, or a 12" tall Great Dane, or a 30lbs Saint Bernard.
Pit bulls were selectively bred into existence to win fights and breeders didn’t just select physical traits
pit like size
And there's the rub. Pits aren't a large dog, or, at least they're not according to standards. Smaller than the average labrador retriever, in fact. But yeah, all that is pretty much meaningless due to backyard breeders messing up the breed. I can't argue that. I'm just a PITA when it comes to words and their meanings.That doesnt hold up because what people tend to refer to generically as 'pit bulls' very often tend to be, of pitbull stock. If someone cross bred a Chihuahua with any other rat dog, its still a rat dog and you arent gonna find too many people arguing about the terminology of some little loud ass ankle biter. Would it make you feel better if the media referred to them as 'pit type dog' or large canidae of pit like size, temperment, and appearance?
Its like the gun terminology s except with dogs.