- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 54,672
- Reaction score
- 18,539
Meh, I don't think any of them is better. Fedor was fast but very sloppy at times.
Stipe is powerful but defencively he's quite stiff, prone to reaching forward with quite mechnical arm punches and not great at slipping offence.
Again I think his career has really been based on exploiting weaknesses, look at fights like JDS and Reem, he didnt enguage then in technical kickboxing fights then pick out an amazingly timed punch to finish, he bullrushed them back against the cage were they are both very poor and unloaded.
The idea he's the best technical boxer we've ever seen at HW was really just UFC hype, if evolution was correct then Stipe MUST be the best but actually watching his fights with a more critical eye I think questions that.
Maybe someone like mid 00's Sergei wouldnt have been as smart in exploiting opponents weaknesses I spose, as I said I think Stipe is a very smart fighter in the cage but I don't think he's an amazing technical boxer.