What I would say, as someone who's been boxing for nearly a decade (I'm no champ by any means but I know I bit what I'm talking about) is that all this boxing "science" thing is complete bullshit.
There isn't actually that much to know in boxing, and someone with a good physique, bad intentions and some technical and tactical knowledge can go quite far. That's why fighters who start MMA late quite rapidly become competent in striking while still sucking big time in grappling.
Despite the fact that I've been boxing for 10 years, I know there are some guys with far less knowledge and experience than me that could beat me... The technical and tactical superiority doesn't matter that much past a certain point.
In grappling, things are completely different. There is no MMA fighter on earth that would have the beginning of a fraction of a chance aginst Gordon. Why ? Because there are WAAAAAAAYYYY more things to know in grappling than there is in boxing. It's not even close. Hence why BJJ instructionals are super long and dense while striking instructionals (especially boxing ones) are super shallow. There isn't just that much to know, and there isn't any "science" by any means.