- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 25,631
- Reaction score
- 7,907
I agree that negotiations should be done at the contract signing time and not between fights. The only exception should be if you win a belt of some sort. That should be a reason for a new contract.
An average fighter should get about 4.5 times the median salary. The reason is a typical person works about 45 years (20-65) while a typical fighter career is about 10 years. Let's say a median salary is 65k a year. A fighter should be expected to fight 3 times a year. That would equal to just under 100k per fight not counting bonuses. That means that for non top-10 fighters UFC pays about 2-3x below what it should be paying assuming a fighter has 3+ years of experience and a decent record.
If UFC cannot schedule a fight, a fighter should be compensated accordingly. But being dumb in training is not a reason for a compensation. On top of that a fighter can find sponsors (outside the octagon), train people, use platforms such as Youtube and Instagram....
Also, picking opponents needs to stop unless the fighter is an expert at self-marketing.
An average fighter should get about 4.5 times the median salary. The reason is a typical person works about 45 years (20-65) while a typical fighter career is about 10 years. Let's say a median salary is 65k a year. A fighter should be expected to fight 3 times a year. That would equal to just under 100k per fight not counting bonuses. That means that for non top-10 fighters UFC pays about 2-3x below what it should be paying assuming a fighter has 3+ years of experience and a decent record.
If UFC cannot schedule a fight, a fighter should be compensated accordingly. But being dumb in training is not a reason for a compensation. On top of that a fighter can find sponsors (outside the octagon), train people, use platforms such as Youtube and Instagram....
Also, picking opponents needs to stop unless the fighter is an expert at self-marketing.