- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Messages
- 35,850
- Reaction score
- 11,127
It is the educated, career minded women in their 30s that are having the mating crisis, not men. They are finding out too late that the men they desire most, the “high value men” making $100k+/year, with high status, etc, are more interested with younger women in their 20s, because now they have the resources to get the women they couldn’t get as easily when they were the same age. These spinsters thought they wanted their career, and now realize they missed out on a lot of living.
True. A degree is just one way in which a man can show status. It’s a nice way, but it’s value takes a long time to pay off, not just financially, either."We have mating inequality in the country," he said, adding that women with college degrees don't want to partner with men who don't hold a degree."
Not true. Women don't want to end up with lazy broke ass men. Having a degree doesn't factor into in most cases.
Exactly.Anyone with half a brain would be investing into wine stocks, petco and anything cat related. This coming crisis has nothing to do with 'lonely' men.
The “dregs of society” as you refer to them, always outbreed the upper classes. It’s nature. That’s their survival mechanism. Breed more, to ensure a better chance that one of their offspring find success and continue the line. People with resources will procreate less, and focus their resources on the fewer children they have, in order to better ensure their offspring find successThis was the assessment, an opinion. of 1 man. You will pardon me if I don't start shitting myself just yet.
The value of a degree vs the cost has been inverted for nearly a decade. In another 10 years you will see fewer women going to college as well, unless there are changes to either the cost of the degree or the additional revenue having one generates.
And the dregs of society being unable to procreate is a good thing. That's the way it supposed to work.