Adolf also regarded the British Empire as a model for the Third Reich.
I miss the Good Old Days...
Nah, I'm the type of guy who watches Star Wars movies and cheers for the Empire. I love the fact my ancestors raped, pillaged and burned their way across a quarter of the entire planet.
You know that there was no permit. The police were told to stand down. The media treated the violent protests like they were something righteous. It was sickening to watch unfold and see so many on the left justifying it.
I don't need to. The protestor who brandished his weapon at Perry gave him all the justification he needed.
Have you seen the tape? He was at a full stop.
I'm not answering the "where did he lose his rights" straw man. The gun didn't need to be pointed directly at Perry's eyeball to qualify as a threat. Since you're pretending to have watched the whole trial, do you recall this officer's testimony?
www.statesman.com
Lol show where there was any violence at this protest before Perry actions. I get you are another one that wants to classify every BLM protest as violent to justify sickening actions taken against this protester exercising multiple rights. However the violence that took place during this particular protest was carried out by the shooter who stated he wanted to take such actions. Apparently you find this key information unimportant.
That's not how the law works. You don't get to take actions against others because you don't like or agree with what they are doing. Perry ran a red light turned when the road wasn't clear for him to do so, these actions are not to be ignored. Nor are his statement about how he would go about being able getting away with shooting protestor.
He was at a full stop because otherwise he would have driven into the protester. He started his actions and the protesters reacted in the short amount of time they had to react. You don't get to drive your vehicle into pedestrians in the street on purpose then claim you did nothing wrong.
You don't want to answer the question because it's a key point that would make your backwards opinion wrong lol. Foster legally open carrying his firearm doesn't make him a threat. The same would apply to anyone open carrying where the laws allow them to do so. The police officers opinion isn't a statement of law. The way Foster was carrying the weapon was not against the law, otherwise the officer himself failed to enforce the law.
This guy was a real piece oh shit. He probably felt like a big man intimidating people with it.
There's an interview with him. He was carrying it out of juvenile spite, because he felt all of his other rights were being trampled on.
That interview was like an hour before he got killed too. "They won't let us block roads anymore so I started carrying my rifle. The people who hate us are pussies and won't do anything about it."
Nah, Antifa trash pointing guys at people and surrounding/attacking cars (which happened all the time during the Floyd terrorist riots) deserve what they get. If you want to see "law not being enfoced" go to big cities where Soros DAs let off actual murderers, rapists and thieves all of the time.
He's my hero because I don't think people should be running around with AK's trying to intimidate others?
Read the exchange. We were discussing the BLM POS being warned by the police about how he was acting. But, I'm well aware your partisan brain is incapable of understanding thats its possible I think both are a POS.
