I see and understand things on a very intuitive level. Breaking it into perfect technical analysis is a work in progressGSP, in fact he came back better.
Shitty thinking?your analysis just plain sucks. No technical offering.
I see and understand things on a very intuitive level. Breaking it into perfect technical analysis is a work in progress
Other people are much better at this than me. I try to capture the overall essence, it's my way of thinking in general, but in terms of precise detail, theres others who could break things down much better.
But I'll improve on this over time
Rolling for example, theres moments where I just get it, but if you asked me to explain it logically, in detail, I'd have a hard time capturing that essenceGSP, in fact he came back better.
Shitty thinking?your analysis just plain sucks. No technical offering.
Chang Sung Jung, I forgot to mention him also.
How the hell do you give Nate a 10-8 for round 3? How in the world? And Conor with a 3 kd round only gets a 10-9? Make it make senseGreat fight
1 Conor
2 Conor
3 Nate (10-8)
4 Conor
5 Nate
Draw
Nate was knocked down once in the first and twice in the second but they were more flops than hard knock downs. Conor was saved by the bell in the third.How the hell do you give Nate a 10-8 for round 3? How in the world? And Conor with a 3 kd round only gets a 10-9? Make it make sense