- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12,072
- Reaction score
- 11,770
Well he doesn't have a lot, he's #1 contender for a reason. Sometimes the rankings are spot on, and I think they are mostly for the LW division. I think Khabib, while one of the best fighters ever, severely overestimates his student Makhachev. Incidentally I think that should be Conor's next fight.
But Poirier is #1. And he should be. And he should fight for the belt. He doesn't have a whole lot of weaknesses. However I don't think that Conor is really the best litmus test; Conor has not been serious about MMA since 2016. He hasn't been a threat to anyone in the upper tier since 2016. Conor did for Dustin what Donald did for Conor; made him look invincible.
No slight against Dustin or Conor, or Cowboy for that matter. They're all spectacular fighters. Donald in his prime was a Dragonball Z character.
But Poirier is #1. And he should be. And he should fight for the belt. He doesn't have a whole lot of weaknesses. However I don't think that Conor is really the best litmus test; Conor has not been serious about MMA since 2016. He hasn't been a threat to anyone in the upper tier since 2016. Conor did for Dustin what Donald did for Conor; made him look invincible.
No slight against Dustin or Conor, or Cowboy for that matter. They're all spectacular fighters. Donald in his prime was a Dragonball Z character.