- Joined
- Mar 22, 2017
- Messages
- 874
- Reaction score
- 0
o1.5 latifi pedro at evens could be good. pedro recovered quick from that roundtree left. thoughts?
Pedro seems to hang out in the clinch a lot, which I think is a very poor decision against Latifi. Rountree could and should have finished Pedro off if he hadn't fucked up, and even Craig landed some good shots.o1.5 latifi pedro at evens could be good. pedro recovered quick from that roundtree left. thoughts?
what does this mean?And luckily MMA lines are ridiculously soft, so you can get away with it.
there is value on one of the sides more often in mma than other sportswhat does this mean?
It's a new sport, the bookies aren't given anywhere near as much 'behind the scenes' info as they are in other sports, and the matchmaking's a lot more competitive/honest as a rule of thumb than other major combat sports. There's a thing on Betmma that shows that taking every UFC underdog between 2.2-2.8 would give a 10% return for years.there is value on one of the sides more often in mma than other sports
anyone betting sarah mores? looking too bet evans myself. just wondering if im missing something. mores seems to find a way to end up on bottom every time. not good striking. serviceable jitz on back to keep her safe but not dangerous unless opponent is weak there or makes huge error. doesn't get up either. injuries. not expecting vast improvements
It's WMMA, Vieira looked better vs AES than against Faszholz so maybe improving at a fast pace and McMann is 36 years old so she might fall off.Can anyone make a case for Ketlen Viera?
It's WMMA, Vieira looked better vs AES than against Faszholz so maybe improving at a fast pace and McMann is 36 years old so she might fall off.
Can anyone make a case for Ketlen Viera?
Pedro seems to hang out in the clinch a lot, which I think is a very poor decision against Latifi. Rountree could and should have finished Pedro off if he hadn't fucked up, and even Craig landed some good shots.
Latifi @ 1.8 is a rare betting opportunity in my book. It's almost as bad as Lamas being an underdog to Knight for no particular reason.
Bhullar is a very small HW, he's 5'11, definitely not the 6'1 the UFC site lists him as. He should be a LHW.
His striking is improving but still very slow and amateurish at times.
Henrique has never impressed me, his striking is probably on the same level as Bhullar's, maybe slightly better.
Henrique has a BJJ advantage and a bad gas tank.
I think the odds should be closer to even or maybe a very slight advantage to Bhullar.
Really hard to say with the lack of tape on Bhullar.
Kajan Johnson has 5 fights in 6 years including TUF. He's coming off a two year lay off. Labrum/rotator cuff surgery and opening his own gym kept him on sidelines. He is self taught has no instructor and trains with a bunch of unknown guys who are basically his pupils. If you include his submission to strikes losses and a random amateur fight he had even though he had fought pro a bunch, hes been stopped by strikes 8 times. His two most recent losses he was one punched ko'd. Laprise aside his UFC opponents hold a combined UFC record of 2-11. Martins' volume is a slight concern, but aside from that Martins holds every advantage i can think of.
I'm all over Latifi, why the hell wouldn't you be?
Pedro.. we now know Paul Craig isn't upto much, and Rountree damn near executed him
And it's more how does this fight play out? I just see Latifi winging bungalows like Rountree did, with no fear of being taken down
Thoughts?
Granted that was a helluva knockout I agreeRountree is a much better striker than Latifi IMO. Plus the last time we've seen Latifi was him getting kneed into oblivion by Bader, who knows how he will look after that.