- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 380
- Reaction score
- 0
I think it's money more than social justice. Black Panther made a killing.
I think you're a dumb ass, not a racist.
I think you're a dumb ass, not a racist.
I think it's money more than social justice. Black Panther made a killing.
I think you're a dumb ass, not a racist.
So you know why black panther made a killing? It was a decent movie but it made more than what it should have.
The original Spider-Man was just a decent movie too, but it made the money it did because people loved the character, they thought he was cool. I'd say the same for Black Panther.
And c'mon guy, Wonder Woman was the first popular female superhero in comics history, and as far as movies go, they haven't had a good track record. Wonder Woman is an accomplishment after fucking Catwoman. People went to see WW because it was the first good one starring a woman.
I didn't read it, but is it a joke him being a Superman?
Superman is created by Siegel and someone else. If they make something like this, it's not Superman anymore. It's Hollywood and it should be just another superhero movie that has nothing to do with Superman, Krypton etc...
But Michael playing Kal-El, that's a joke of the highest order.
I don't know what is worse, this or Idris Elba as James Bond.
When is female Rambo coming out?
riiight.
Ya i dont see it that way at all. Sorry.
The marketing absolutely played up the sjw anti trump narrative to help pull audiences to the theaters.
Wanna know how I know?
Because you are never going to see a marketing narrative that reads "come see _____. finally we have a straight white male playing _____ really well!"
It was never about the movies being good. It was about the movies staring either a female superhero lead or an all black cast movie depicting Africa in a positive light. Both things we've had before. Marketing has learned that if you can play up a victim card you can cash in.
You are trying to spin it each and every way to support your falling argument.Its honest truth. You know damn well why we are not seeing an increased representation of asians in hollywood but instead there is this apparrent outcry over the false narrative that blacks have been under represented in hollywood.
Which was never the case in my life time
It's established and yet I have never seen or heard about a black superman in my entire life?
Looks exactly like the black James Bond situation. I am against changing the race of any established character to appease SJW's. That goes for making characters white that shouldn't be white as well.
You are trying to spin it each and every way to support your falling argument.
You:
- Blacks should not be catered to and over represented percentage wise
Loiosh points Asians are 60% of populace and its Whites massively over represented if you want to go with that logic then
You switch:
- Hollywood makes entertainment for Western culture so catering to Whites is ok
This argument ESTABLISHES and OK's that Hollywood will look out at who they see in the audience and pander. So since it is FACT that ethnics, women and Asians have been increasingly important growing demographics within the film box office it would follow that Hollywood would start to shift some of the pandering to these groups and away from white males. THis is exaclty what we are seeing with an increase shift towards each of these groups.
So you cannot argue it both ways pretending it should be done on population percentage when it suits you and then switching away from that when you are shown to be wrong and saying pandering to whites is ok as Hollywood catered to the West.
nah for the hardcore comic book nerds at least its been established for a long time
Its honest truth. You know damn well why we are not seeing an increased representation of asians in hollywood but instead there is this apparrent outcry over the false narrative that blacks have been under represented in hollywood.
Which was never the case in my life time
that wave has just started. We are already seeing the insertion of more random Asian characters into side and main roles and that will only grow along with your complaint. So you are wrong there. Many complained wrongly (probably you too) about the SJW insertion of the Asian girl in the Star Wars movie.I'm not switching anything.
If this were catering to demographics, we would see a large increase in Asian hero movies.
How many Asians super hero movies are there? Both dc or marvel?
Now compare that to black super heros.
The last avengers movie. A collaboration of all these super heros. How many asians vs how many black heros?
Western made movies are designed to cater to western demographics (canada and the united states) first then global interests second. Blacks in america make up 18 percent. They are over represented in movies BIG TIME because the sjw movement doesn't see Asians as much of a victim card. They don't riot and bitch about white privileged. they just quietly kick ass.
Blacks on the other hand? Fuck sakes. Hollywood is going well out of their way to say "see blacks! we are not racist! We will over represent you in hollywood to prove it!"
It's like that one white guy over ass kissing his one black friend to prove he's not a racist.
We had an adequate representation of blacks in hollywood. there doesnt need to be this huge movement to get MORE blacks in hollywood. If anything you should see more representation of asians in these movies.
But ya dont.
And you knew that already. And you knew WHY.
that wave has just started. We are already seeing the insertion of more random Asian characters into side and main roles and that will only grow along with your complaint. So you are wrong there. Many complained wrongly (probably you too) about the SJW insertion of the Asian girl in the Star Wars movie.
Your presumption that the numbers have to be equal or representative are absolutely wrong and that is not how Hollywood has ever done it. It is not simply a statistical evaluation. If it was it would not have been almost 100% white for so long. They look at much more. So again, you are simply wrong.
Yes, it's the honest truth that you're super aggressive with your identity politics, and you think billion dollar decisions are being made for political reasons not financial ones.
Let me ask you this...
If they decide to spend three hundred million dollars making a black Superman movie, what is their objective, and how is it served making Superman black?
Their objective is to placate this false narrative sjw invented bullshit that blacks are under represented and hollywood isnt racist.
I blame news media bullshit as the ones both inventing the narrative and perpetuating it.
You better love the new black superman or you are racist!
So you think investors are sinking billions of dollars into these projects to placate a false narrative?
Those must be extremely conscientious investors.
I think the media placates the false narrative i think hollywood is using it to make bank by marketig off of it.
So your direct comparison to changing the race of one character, is the races of all the characters in another unrelated franchise should be changed?Hey like I said. You can have a black superman so long as we get a almost entirely black casted empire/new order in the star wars films trying to opress the galaxy as they are fought off by a white male lead sorrounded by a diverse cast of woman. Sound good?