if you really want to see some flat footed fighting take a look at MT. Its probably the flattest footed style of fighting of all, not that guys cant fight on the balls of their feet or bounce in MT........but a really good example of flat foot MT style vs a bouncy on the toes style is sam a vs haggerty. Theres advantages and disadvantages to both ways. another good fighter to watch with a more flat style is yodsanklai.......the bouncy KB style is good on the outside but makes it hard for big power kicks and clinching. another good comparison of these styles is yod vs chike
Don't worry I'm not bothered at all, but thanks for the support! I haven't been following the thread but I'll see if I can check in if I have something to attribute. Hope you're enjoying your christmas!
Did you even watch the videos? The first you can't see their feet on the exchanges, but the second none of them are throwing their punches, including straights, with their feet flat.great point
MT is VERY flat foot when throwing hands in particular
I always liked its unique boxing style
Ali really inspired a LOT of imitators with his mobility and legions of boxing trainers became obsessed with staying on the balls of your feet for "mobility"
in addition the notion that rolling up on the ball of your foot when throwing a cross is "necessary" somehow is just fallacy
Did you even watch the videos? The first you can't see their feet on the exchanges, but the second none of them are throwing their punches, including straights, with their feet flat.
Nobody is talking about leaning over or having all their weight on the front foot. You're moving the goalpost. The oldtimers, including Marciano, Shavers, Louis, Dempsey, Sadler, Armstrong and so on. All of them turned their rear foot over and lifted their heels, so you're wrong again.I don't have to watch the videos to know that Muay Thai advocates for flat foot punching more often than American "on your toes" boxing
Before Muhammad Ali most Fighters were taught to keep their feet firmly planted on the ground as they threw their punches
Bounding around the ring on the balls of your foot was a radical new theory that had definite advantages and definite drawbacks
Nobody in their right mind can argue that athletes dont punch harder off a well planted flat base foot than you do bouncing up, tipping forward or with the majority of your weight on your front foot while some small percentage remains on you rear foot that is now likely entirely off the ground
the only question is whether or not you can land it
Without a doubt a "tipping" punch that lands is better than a well planted punch that misses
That said we should always strive to throw all our punches off well planted flat base feet because that produces the best weight transfer/power into the strike AND reminds us to not lean over too far
The vast majority of successful punches thrown in competition were not thrown with ideal posture
Ideal posture is very rare
My wall example is deadlock proof that the best way to throw your straight punches especially is off a well planted flat base foot
Try it on the heavy bag if you want
Get in the proper boxing stance and start whacking away at the heavy bag with your cross punch
Throw three or four with your rear foot flat on the ground
three or four with your rear foot up on the ball and then throw three or four with your rear foot completely off the ground
It will become immediately apparent to anyone that does this exercise that you're robbing yourself of punching power and posture by doing anything but staying flat on your feet throughout the vast majority of your punches
Nobody is talking about leaning over or having all their weight on the front foot. You're moving the goalpost. The oldtimers, including Marciano, Shavers, Louis, Dempsey, Sadler, Armstrong and so on. All of them turned their rear foot over and lifted their heels, so you're wrong again.
Arguing with you is pointless.
You too cheersDon't worry I'm not bothered at all, but thanks for the support! I haven't been following the thread but I'll see if I can check in if I have something to attribute. Hope you're enjoying your christmas!
You can't stay flat on your rear foot and achieve maximum power - doing so involves removing some of the important muscles that help contribute to power from the equation, as well as limiting your range of motion in the hips.
Ankle extension is an important element of a lot of movements that are explosive - olympic lifting or sprinting, or even things like hitting a baseball and a golf swing.
You can't stay flat on your rear foot and achieve maximum power - doing so involves removing some of the important muscles that help contribute to power from the equation, as well as limiting your range of motion in the hips.
Ankle extension is an important element of a lot of movements that are explosive - olympic lifting or sprinting, or even things like hitting a baseball and a golf swing.
Mike Tyson punched like any other boxer with his rear heel up in the end of the movement.
It's clear in every fight and in any training footage.
You can see him teaching a bunch of people doing it here.
He even uses the cigarette metaphor.
Spacetime clearly has a great challenger.
Lennox also threw the right like any other boxer, like all Emmanuel Steward's boxers did.
With the heel up.
https://cdn-s3.si.com/s3fs-public/images/2001-1117-Lennox-Lewis-Hasim-Rahman-001242926.jpg
try better troll.
Everybody pops the heel up when they "reach out" to hit their target
Its a normal way to get just a bit more reach at a major cost of power
I do i all the time yet i am aware its not the best way to throw a cross
Its not "incorrect"
Theres just a better way to throw your cross
With the heel ON THE GROUND
Ideal "perfect" punches are rare
Most are poor in one category or another
Lots of mythology and fallacy in the fight game
Your confused
You are talking nonsense as usual.
I am sure you do it all the time.
The way you do it is incorrect.
No one punches with the heel on the ground you flat earther freak.
You couldn't tell what's an ideal punch even if you had the national Russian boxing team training in front of you on the park.
Every boxing gym teaches it that way. Rear heel up is what considered ideal.
Your form is certainly poor.
Lots of spacetime's doppelgangers in the stand up forum.
You're ridiculous.
You have the weird idea that if you rotate in the the ball of your rear foot while punching with the rear hand, you will overreach and fall.
The truth is the exact opposite.
Lifting the rear foot and twisting it like putting out a cigarette enables your hips to rotate internally and generate power without having to go forward.
You can stay where the hell you are because you rotate around your body axis.
The few styles that don't lift the heel are old kung fu styles like Tai chi or before 20th century bare knuckle boxing styles
and guess where those punches got power in place of rotation.
By lunging and weight transferring the bulk of their weight in the front foot. The exact thing you think that happens with having the heel up lol.
You were using as examples to validate your drivel two legendary boxers who punch completely differently from what you advocate.
Yet you insinuate that only in these particular snapshots they got it right and the rest 99% they were overextended? LOL
I blame Cus D'Amato and Stewart who taught them this obviously imperfect form.
Thank god they were just boxers or else we might have had to endure watching them kick while rotating in the ball of their foot.
Jesus Lord had mercy upon our souls.