- Joined
- Jul 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1,554
- Reaction score
- 333
I2 reaches a good amouint in Ukraine (Homeland of Proto-Slavs) , Again I've posted several scientific research explaining I2 and R1a migration to Balkans along Slavic barbarians. All you've done is posting these pictures of todays DNA results.
As you can see original balkanian group i2 isn’t really present in Russia or Poland.
This proves my point even more ironically , The only people whom historians , linguists and other renowned schoolars have considered to be paleo-balkan people (Albanians and Greeks) score really low in I2 while peak at E-V13 and J2.
Explain that , well you can't actually. Since anyone with a brain knows that Slavs are migrants to the Balkans unlike Albanians who are culturally , linguistically , genetically indigenous to the region.
"Original Balkan haplogroup I2"
More projection and psuedo-history from you , as usual. Nothing based on facts , only biased speculations.original Balkanians explored Eastern Europe n that’s why their DNA is present there, but not as much as in balkans.
"Wishful thinking" , You sure you aren't talking about yourself?Albanian entire history is speculation n wishful thinking.
the reality is they’re 1st mentioned only in 11th century, way after Slavs n never really had a state of their own, but were subjects of other nations.
Funny enough how yo utry to spin the narrative ,You're the one trying to mix real history with witshful thinking.
History , linguistics , culture and tradition have already told us about the fact that Albanians are indigenous people while Slavs are immigrants from the 6th and 7th century. Genetics are now confirming it even more.
You're so desperate to try and keep your mental gymnastics going , But anyone with a brain can see who are the indigenous people of the Balkans and who are immigrants. Your migration is literally documented kid , stop trying.
It was under Serbian rule, Bulgarians , Byzantium and ROme had it before while Illyrian tribes ruled over it before that.it only became majority Albanian after serbs were driven out by ottomans n brought their Albanian minions to replace them.
it has a Serbian name n it was under Serbian rule, never Albanian.
Serbs and Orthodoxs in general were way less persecuted than Catholics , Ottoman gave Orthodoxs religious freedom due to the Orthodox highest bodies being inside the Emprie while Catholicism being seen as a foreign threat.Sure, they had such better living conditions that they were driven out n replaced by Albanians who took ottoman religion.
who are you trying to fool? Do you even believe the crap you say?
also serbs has multiple rebellion n 2 uprising n were freed from ottoman occupation?
what did Albanians do? They were sending arnauts to their ottoman master.
they only got freed when serbs kicked the ottoman out.
You really have a lot of things in common with Turks , Dusan also had the same , in fact more hostility towards Catholics.
Serbs revolts were crushed , They paid taxes and stayed calm. Didn't keep any autonomy or whatsoever. Finally were liberated when Daddy Russia stepped in since they wanted to expand their influence in the Balkans.
While in the Albanian highlands the role were reserved , Ottomans were crushed everytime they tried to subdue Albanian highlanders.
Hence why Albanian Highlanders kept their independence during Ottoman Rule. Can't say the same about your ancestors.....
How were Albanians sending Arnauts? Do you know that it means Albanians sending ALbanians?
Didn't I already school you about the etymology of "Arnaut"?
You're so clueless , desperate and sad at the same time.
"Albanian terrorist"Yes currently it’s under Albanian terrorist n other criminal control backed by NATO.
the way things look right now that alliance won’t last long n then Kosovo will be liberated.
Now, unlike Albanians, serbs are not tribal n can actually live in multiethnic state.
I don't recall Albanians commiting genocide anywhere in the last century? Neither do I recall them killing multiple childrens and even pregnant women?
Pretty sure who the terrorists were , attrocities happen everywhere. But in Serbs case they are known for it.
Ironically so , Since a lot of them are Slavicized Albanians(Confirmed by traditions , history , genetics). Especially the pro-serb fanatics from Brda.as for Montenegro... it’s under western control with that puppet in charge stealing elections. most Montenegrins are actually pro serb.
Although they betrayed their Albanian identity and switched to Slavic they still were braver than the rest of Serbs.
Similar to Albanian highlanders they kept their independence too during Ottoman rule.
Also from which region are you? Probably you may check your DNA if you got some connections to the mentioned regions. ...
Yet most of the pre-slavic toponyms (for as few as they are) only can be translated within Albanian......It didn’t have to be named “Kosovo” cause it wasn’t a separate state. It was just a unified Serbian state.
after ottoman invasion it became a vilayet n it was name Kosovo for Kosovo field. A Serbian name, cause serbs were living there.
Albanians literally have no claim to it what so ever
Now class is dismissed
It is known that after Slavic invasions Albanians were driven out of their territories , Several Serb historians have accepted it too.
What you're saying makes complete sense , It has zero connection to Albanians having a country as you've said or Albanians having claim over Kosovo.
The region now is 94% Albanian and owned by Albanians , How they ahve no claim over it?
Probably you should listen to the professor more carefully , instead of listening to braindeads like Jovan Deretic and other serbian psuedohistorians.