Crime Police Shoot Man In Back, Riots and Unrest Ensue

He didn’t wield a knife. Unless you have a picture where he has a knife(I’ll apologize if so)

The picture, albeit a little hard to make out, has been posted in this thread numerous times. The police confirmed what we were speculating on. It was a knife. While I can't be arsed to go back and find it, I'm sure someone else will oblige you real quick. He was holding a knife. He dropped it on the floor of the van when he was shot.
 
I've seen this narrative really picking up steam over the last few hours...
a1xq2z1ytkj51.jpg

in the lat few hours?
 
A Witness heard officers yelling at him to “drop the knife” prior to going around and into the car. The only photo we have is grainy but shows a possible curved blade (karambit?) in his hand. DOJ confirmed a knife was found on the floorboard where he was shot. All signs are pointing to he had a knife out and his hand.
The car wasn't his either
 
Sorry, i dont fap over this stuff for hours at a time. Two homicide charges, one attempted.

I think my relevant premises are correct: out of state kid, illegally possessed gun, several homicide charges.

Correct?

Don't fap. But don't spout off like you know shit either. Basic stuff.
 
Last edited:
But apparently the cops knew that it wasn’t his car I was just told. And I was just told that they should have foreseen him taking said car and killing the occupants and that is a potential reason he was shot.
Yeah, they should have thought there was a gun in there
 
But apparently the cops knew that it wasn’t his car I was just told. And I was just told that they should have foreseen him taking said car and killing the occupants and that is a potential reason he was shot.

It's almost like having a stolen car with kids in it, while you violently struggle with police with a deadly weapon in your possession, is alarming or something...

My god, how far are you willing to go to validate this piece of shit? You're essentially at, "Just because he was pointing a gun at someone, doesn't mean he was going to pull the trigger!"

You guys are lost.
 
The car wasn't his either
Not that it changes the goodness of the shoot, but are we clear on that? I have read a couple of articles that were very poorly written and didn’t clearly differentiate between the earlier complaint and the one that lead to him being shot.

Earlier this summer he is alleged to have broken into his ex’s place, digitally raped her, then stole her ATM card and car and stole I think $500 from her.

This one for sure he had come to her place again but I’m not sure if he was attempting to steal her car once again or if he had his own with him.
 
It's almost like having a stolen car with kids in it, while you violently struggle with police with a deadly weapon in your possession, is alarming or something...

My god, how far are you willing to go to validate this piece of shit? You're essentially at, "Just because he was pointing a gun at someone, doesn't mean he was going to pull the trigger!"

You guys are lost.
Its truly amazing how much they have to elevate these thug pieces of shit to near sainthood
 
Not that it changes the goodness of the shoot, but are we clear on that? I have read a couple of articles that were very poorly written and didn’t clearly differentiate between the earlier complaint and the one that lead to him being shot.

Earlier this summer he is alleged to have broken into his ex’s place, digitally raped her, then stole her ATM card and car and stole I think $500 from her.

This one for sure he had come to her place again but I’m not sure if he was attempting to steal her car once again or if he had his own with him.
He had stole her keys again at least what she said to the dispatcher
 
  • Like
Reactions: JSN
Are they tanking it?
I don't know. I'm baffled. It's like they just said 'Hey defense team, here's your game plan. See you in court.'.

But I admittedly don't know much about Wisconsin law. There is probably a legal angle that they are looking to attack from. They have to have something. They aren't looking to get completely embarrassed in court on a national stage.
 
Its truly amazing how much they have to elevate these thug pieces of shit to near sainthood

It's pure insanity. No other way to describe it. I'm pretty reasonable with this shit, and willing to hear all the nuance of a situation, but this is cut and dry. The guy was a threat to not only the police officers, but his own kids. It's a little disturbing that so many want to rush to his defense, even after the facts are presented.

It all boils down to people arguing for criminal rights, which is so ass backwards, that I can't even begin to comprehend it.
 
I don't know. I'm baffled. It's like they just said 'Hey defense team, here's your game plan. See you in court.'.

But I admittedly don't know much about Wisconsin law. There is probably a legal angle that the are looking to attack from. They have to have something. They aren't looking to get completely embarrassed in court on a national stage.
I've never seen a criminal complaint like that
 
Back
Top