Social WR Lounge v232: But I did ask for Uranus

[Jack V Savage]

Maybe we could revisit the Elizabeth Warren topic you had the meltdown over and got us time out in the bet thread. You declined that bet, because you said it couldn't be proven and I said we'll pick judges. You still declined.

I didn't have any meltdown. And in that one, you were continually lying about my position. That itself is proof that you knew you were wrong.

Anyway, if you want to have a serious discussion on a topic, why not immigration or inflation? Or your anti-free-speech position?

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

The whole point of the bet was so you wouldn't just fold the FBI into your theory. Instead of admitting that there was no crime after law enforcement didn't find any, you just "admitted" that you didn't know the FBI was corrupt. Incredibly but typically dishonest move by you.

Then too bad someone of your elite intellectual prowess wasn't smart enough to frame it differently. Live and learn.

Now tell me what you were disagreeing with earlier. Let me help you out, since you're acting so slow on the matter. Which of these are false.

• I offered to debate you on whether or not Hilary's actions broke the law
• You declined that debate
• You're sure she didn't break the law

 

[Sara]

The wife prefers mine long. I'm no Antonio, so likely she just has bad taste.

Meh, everyone is different, I don’t tend find blond men attractive, I prefer dark hair. The only person I can think of that I though looked good with long hair is Anthony Keidis or how ever you spell it from the RHCP

 

[Sara]

Then too bad someone of your elite intellectual prowess wasn't smart enough to frame it differently. Live and learn.

Now tell me what you were disagreeing with earlier. Let me help you out, since you're acting so slow on the matter. Which of these are false.

• I offered to debate you on whether or not Hilary's actions broke the law
• You declined that debate
• You're sure she didn't break the law

You know shit got serious if your pulling out bullet points.....

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

And in that one, you were continually lying about my position.

No, liar. I meticulously quoted your end of the conversation as it played out just so everyone could see how wrong you were.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Anyway, if you want to have a serious discussion on a topic, why not immigration or inflation? Or your anti-free-speech position?

Which of those are we both experts on? If you can't debate on Hilary because we're not lawyers, I'm assuming you're applying the same standard here.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

You know shit got serious if your pulling out bullet points.....

He's smarmy and acts like it's everyone but him being that way.

 

[Sara]

Sometimes when I’m asking questions about a situation or person, I literally have not taken a side yet, but someone here will jump down my throat and say I’m defending them, and sometimes just cause they’re being assholes, I’ll just argue back regardless of how a feel about the situation.

 

[Sara]

He's smarmy and acts like it's everyone but him being that way.

You get a rare Sara like.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

You get a rare Sara like.

Thanks.

How come they're rare? You selling them to @Rebelfett and that's how he wadtucket's the Lounge threads?

 

[Sara]

Thanks.

How come they're rare? You selling them to @Rebelfett and that's how he wadtucket's the Lounge threads?

I honestly just forget to use them sometimes, and think they need to be earned.

 

[LazaRRus]

You get a rare Sara like.

I think I lead the league in Sara likes.

 

[LazaRRus]

Lol. Who is RidenwithBiden?

 

[StoneColdSteveAustin]

Lol. You want to bet your success up against mine? How about we cut out the bullshit and enjoy this, Kong

Oh is that what you want to do? Say you have more money than other people? like you do all over the website Like a compete tool. No one is impressed

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I honestly just forget to use them sometimes, and think they need to be earned.

Fair enough. I'll sling 'em for these reasons.

• Making me laugh
• Making an interesting point
• Bothering to respond
• Show of general support
• Acknowledging I've read a response in absence of further response on my part

 

[Jack V Savage]

No, liar. I meticulously quoted your end of the conversation as it played out just so everyone could see how wrong you were.

Wrong. You brought up two statements that I said were the same, as in parts of one whole. You interpreted that as them being the same, as in logically equivalent. I pointed out the error, and you stood by it, which you stood by (meaning it wasn't just a dumb misunderstanding; you were intentionally getting it wrong--that is, lying).

 

[My Spot]

He's smarmy and acts like it's everyone but him being that way.

And then puts you on ignore with 100+ other posters per his admission. <Lmaoo>

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I think I lead the league in Sara likes.

She's after that RR chedda.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Wrong. You brought up two statements that I said were the same, as in parts of one whole. You interpreted that as them being the same, as in logically equivalent. I pointed out the error, and you stood by it, which you stood by (meaning it wasn't just a dumb misunderstanding; you were intentionally getting it wrong--that is, lying).

Sure, champ. You dicktuckin' on this post or what?

Now tell me what you were disagreeing with earlier. Let me help you out, since you're acting so slow on the matter. Which of these are false.

• I offered to debate you on whether or not Hilary's actions broke the law
• You declined that debate
• You're sure she didn't break the law

 

[senri]

2009 I think?

Ah, thank you.