Law Justice Amy Coney Barrett denies appeal to block the vaccine mandate at Indiana University

How many john roberts do we need at this point, this one just happens to wear her skirt in public. saying you're a catholic ought to disqualify you from any judgeship.
Any moran thats ever seen a statue of Mary is on par with most catholics and yet people are still smitten over a single roe v wade position.
Its disappointing, I'm not going to lie. Just like it is seeing guys here chuck it up like everything is good as long as it makes Trump and conservatives look bad, fools don't have enough sense to look at places like Australia and the boot thats been put over their throats over this same bullshit.
Ah.
 
Pretty sure I needed an MMR shot to attend public grade school.

And a great example of why slippery slope isn't a fallacy. "Oh, you were fine taking this vaccine proven over decades that prevents this incurable and debilitating disease with 100% efficacy? Then you should have no problem taking a potentially unlimited number of doses of this experimental drug that has only about an 80% chance at preventing from you catching a disease you are 99.9% likely to survive, in order to go to Applebee's".
 
And a great example of why slippery slope isn't a fallacy. "Oh, you were fine taking this vaccine proven over decades that prevents this incurable and debilitating disease with 100% efficacy? Then you should have no problem taking a potentially unlimited number of doses of this experimental drug that has only about an 80% chance at preventing from you catching a disease you are 99.9% likely to survive, in order to go to Applebee's".

No shoes, no shirt, no service.
 
True. But the MMR vaccine isn’t an emergency use vaccine like the Covid ones are. I think there should be a difference and it should be respected due to emergency use authorization

Will your opinion on this change when the covid vaccine does get the full approval?
 
And a great example of why slippery slope isn't a fallacy. "Oh, you were fine taking this vaccine proven over decades that prevents this incurable and debilitating disease with 100% efficacy? Then you should have no problem taking a potentially unlimited number of doses of this experimental drug that has only about an 80% chance at preventing from you catching a disease you are 99.9% likely to survive, in order to go to Applebee's".

You think MMR has a 100% efficacy?

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/mmr/public/index.html

One dose of MMR vaccine is 93% effective against measles, 78% effective against mumps, and 97% effective against rubella. Two doses of MMR vaccine are 97% effective against measles and 88% effective against mumps.

You should also ask @PhitePhan about the side effects.
 
It is highly unlikely they ever revisit Roe v. Wade. This is a Supreme Court that isn't interested in rocking the boat.

They don’t like playing politics, not even a little. Hell former Justice Sandra Day O’Conner basically went to her grave regretting her Bush v. Gore vote ... and she was said to be a conservative.

Roe v. Wade is safe so long as leftists don’t abuse it...
 
These conditions also have probably roughly a 99.9% survival rate.
With measles, it's more like 99.99 survival rate, and that was BEFORE we learned that Vit A deficiency was such a risk factor (this can be easily supplemented to further reduce mortality, as recommended by WHO).
 
And a great example of why slippery slope isn't a fallacy. "Oh, you were fine taking this vaccine proven over decades that prevents this incurable and debilitating disease with 100% efficacy? Then you should have no problem taking a potentially unlimited number of doses of this experimental drug that has only about an 80% chance at preventing from you catching a disease you are 99.9% likely to survive, in order to go to Applebee's".

Start off with incorrect stats on MMR is not a surprise coming from you. 97% for measles and 88% for mumps. But really, what are stats and facts when you drive your decisions based on emotions?
 
And a great example of why slippery slope isn't a fallacy. "Oh, you were fine taking this vaccine proven over decades that prevents this incurable and debilitating disease with 100% efficacy? Then you should have no problem taking a potentially unlimited number of doses of this experimental drug that has only about an 80% chance at preventing from you catching a disease you are 99.9% likely to survive, in order to go to Applebee's".
232207796_4775215959173904_4841835966867993142_n.jpg
 
I guess the sky isn't gonna fall like Dems and libs told me it would when she replaced RBG after all. :)
 
Luckily, this will have little impact on those who choose to educate themselves against medical authoritarianism. Knowledge is power.

IU Expands COVID-19 Vaccine Exemption Policy
Indiana University added an ethical exemption to its COVID-19 vaccine mandate,
according to university spokesperson Chuck Carney.

Carney said in an email the additional exemption brings the COVID-19 vaccine requirement in line with previous requirements, such as last year’s influenza vaccine. The ethical exemption is in addition to medical and religious exemptions previously allowed by the university, but it does not mean more people are opting out.
https://indianapublicmedia.org/news/iu-expands-covid-19-vaccine-exemption-policy.php
 
I shouldn't have to obey any speed limits, nor should they exist. I've lived driving above the speed limit 99.99% of the time, so what's the point? Remove them, and if people are scared to drive on roads with me doing 150 mph+, stay home.
Comparing speed limits to force injecting people with experimental biologics?

Why do you guys always have to rely on ridiculous justifications and logical fallacies? It's almost like you can't use rational thinking to support your position...
 
Back
Top