Rewatch Sakuraba vs. Newton: the myth (it isn’t an all-time great fight).

panem-et-circenses

In the garden
Joined
May 26, 2021
Messages
6,056
Reaction score
9,316
Let me start by saying Sakuraba is one of my favorite fighters. Like a lot of people pre-TUF, he was one of the fighters I was drawn to, for a bunch of different reasons, including his strength of schedule, personality and quality of his fights (overall). Sakuraba-Newton was not an MMA fight. At the very least, considering all we know about fighting many years later, it’s clear that an agreement was made to not strike on the ground.

Both fighters pull punches, and no significant strikes are landed on the feet or ground, leading to some grappling sequences that are on par with a flow-roll. Someone brought up Rampage-Saku being an example of a ‘fake fight’ (they rewatched it and don’t say that anymore), which I didn’t agree with, but it’s clear that Newton-Saku is the example of a ‘fake’ MMA bout. Like some Rizin matches, it would be entered into the Sherdog database as an exhibition.


giphy.gif


giphy.gif


You can watch for yourself above. If the fight happened in 2023, it would be red flagged, both fighters would be suspended and Sherdog would go crazy. Within its proper context — does it really matter? No, not really. But I still see it being referenced today as an example of great grappling in an MMA bout. It isn’t that.
 
Last edited:
GOAT of striking, grappling and everything else you would ever want in combat.

GorgeousDecentHalibut-mobile.mp4


And yes, it's a fantastic fight, even with the agreement.
 
I used to think Carlos Newton was Vitor Belfort except he had dreads for a while
 
It wasn't a fight, just a good display of grappling for that time. Nobody ever claimed it was a great fight
 
Wonder if TS would agree that more than half of all the UFC's higher weight class fights today are "fake" due to the fact that they're just kickboxing matches.
 
Wild child brought up Rampage-Saku being an example of a ‘fake fight’....
Honestly, I always chalked this up to miscommunication.

If UFC folded and years later a fighter causally mentioned that Dana told them if they fought in a fun but stupid way and lost they'd earn $50k for FOTN, fans might call that suspicious too.

Now obviously Dana White wouldn't say "go ahead and fight hard and stupid", but that's where the miscommunication comes into play.

IMO no one in the game actually believes Sakakibara was asking Rampage to throw the fight, except a few fans trying too hard to find conspiracies.
 
Last edited:
There are fights where fighters agree to keep it standing, no submissions, are those also just exhibitions (even if someone gets KO'd). I know those happen for sure in the UFC, where guys agree to not go for subs or to the ground
 
Back
Top