Social Kyle Rittenhouse Booed off Stage at University of Memphis When Faced With Protestors

[Death By Samson]

The retards still think he killed black people

I saw one of the protesters talking about how he was protesting Rittenhouse to confront white supremacy.

 

[Poon Goon]

More strangely, echoing the OP itself, you guys have put in no work into proving that Kirk is a racist. I'm simply going off what was presented to me in the article. And the burden of proving that Kirk is a racist is yours. Nobody unfamiliar with Kirk should be expected to accept that he is a racist without it.

Moreover, I don't care for this denigration-by-assocation circus. Rittenhouse isn't Kirk. If he shares or repeats opinions held by Kirk, then those are relevant.

Spare me more Googling. How is Kirk a racist? Make your case.

I don't give a shit if Kirk is racist so I wouldn't waste my time trying to prove it one way or the other. I just pointed out that if you were so easily able to disprove that he's a racist then maybe Ritterhouse should have been able to do the same at this event.

 

[Madmick]

He's a conservative who spends the majority of his energy sticking it to black people and talking about how awesome it is to be white. He helped make Candace Owens into what she was making videos on PragerU like this one.

I never talk about Kirk because he's nobody, he's an infinitely replaceable alt right figure, a university drop out that talks about how useless university is.

I've never called Kirk racist but if you asked me if he was, I'd say definitely. He's the one who said if he saw a black pilot he'd be afraid it was a DEI hire. No matter what you think of DEI, that's pretty racist.

I've definitely never called Rittenhouse racist, I know almost nothing about him.

I don't give a shit if Kirk is racist so I wouldn't waste my time trying to prove it one way or the other. I just pointed out that if you were so easily able to disprove that he's a racist then maybe Ritterhouse should have been able to do the same at this event.

A minute ago you two were making condescending wink-wink remarks due to my objection to the characterization of this man as a racist based on what was presented to me in the article linked in the OP. Suddenly you're backpedaling like a couple of cross-eyed hamsters.

That was quick. Concession accepted.

 

[Poon Goon]

A minute ago you two were making condescending wink-wink remarks based on my objection to the characterization of this man as a racist based on what was presented to me in the article linked in the OP. Suddenly you're backpedaling like a couple of cross-eyed hamsters.

That was quick. Concession accepted.

I was mainly just making fun of you. I'm not surprised that you can't see that and I don't care to explain the joke to you.

 

[HereticBD]

Focus. You just called me racist and I asked you why.

You can't, because you know I'm not.

You think black people are incapable, intellectually stunted idiots, who need your, "the white man's" help. They're nothing but a prop for you to use to make yourself feel better. You barely consider them human.

How's that?

 

[Confucamus]

Is that what you call them at your Klan meetings?

Police guide that calls BLM a terrorist group draws outrage

This is a typical coward response, and it also bears no weight in reality either. You know this, but you couldn't care less how much that violent and divisive movement has damaged America. Keep calling everyone you don't like a white supremacist, and watch as the world indifferently passes by you and others like you.

 

[evansusmc2]

Hello ASVAB waiver, here’s a thought: two things can be true, all molesters need to be deleted and Kyle is a moron.

You mean college grad.... Now that you have been corrected...

Your opinion of Kyle WHILE staying quiet about everything that surrounded him that day is ridiculous. You also a supporter of the rioters huh?

 

[Area809]

It's the whole angle for anybody who thinks sticking up for yourself against BLM terrorists is a bad thing. If that asswipe movement is allowed to storm every major city in America like that, then Rittenhouse has every right to help a friend defend their business while armed.

He wasn’t sticking up for himself. He literally went to another state looking for a fight of some sort. Untrained idiot kids with guns is not the answer.

 

[Area809]

You mean college grad.... Now that you have been corrected...

Your opinion of Kyle WHILE staying quiet about everything that surrounded him that day is ridiculous. You also a supporter of the rioters huh?

I don’t think untrained kids should be running around with firearms in public. I’m assuming you’re a Marine like me, based on your username. As a grunt, I even have a problem being around POGs when bullets are flying. If you tell me the kid was defending his home or parent’s business, I’d support it. But he literally went out of his way to a different state. I would have tried to talk him out of it. He made a moronic decision. Now the kid is trying to grift off of it, but it’s quite evident he has nothing of substance to offer in these public speaking engagements.

 

[Loiosh]

A minute ago you two were making condescending wink-wink remarks based on my objection to the characterization of this man as a racist based on what was presented to me in the article linked in the OP. Suddenly you're backpedaling like a couple of cross-eyed hamsters.

That was quick. Concession accepted.

Because you're hilarious and transparent.

How did I backpedal? I never called Kirk racist until you asked the question. Your "research" and findings reek of someone that made his mind up beforehand.

 

[Loiosh]

This is a typical coward response, and it also bears no weight in reality either. You know this, but you couldn't care less how much that violent and divisive movement has damaged America. Keep calling everyone you don't like a white supremacist, and watch as the world indifferently passes by you and others like you.

BLM isn't violent.

There are fifty chapters and I'm sure there are exceptions, but those exceptions are condemned by the whole.

They didn't divide America but they damaged white supremacy, which is why you hate them.

Conservatives called members of the civil rights movement Marxist terrorists, and you're doing the same now with BLM. Conservatives love to quote that one passage from that one speech from MLK, but when he was alive they called him the most dangerous man in America. If MLK had a criticism of BLM it would be that they're too passive.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

If MLK had a criticism of BLM it would be that they're too passive.

They should grift some more, it's true.
Buying house after house is just too little grift.

 

[llperez22]

He wasn’t sticking up for himself. He literally went to another state looking for a fight of some sort. Untrained idiot kids with guns is not the answer.

for someone with no training you could make a training video of how kyle handled his firearm and showed restraint and actually dropped his rifle twice when guys were no longer a threat and only shot guys who directly assaulted him. I mean cops could take a lesson from the display of gun control that kyle demonstrated that night. Also please do realize you make yourself look dumb with the whole "he drove to a different state" stuff. It was a 20 minute drive. He worked in wisconsin, had friends and family in wisconsin. 2 of the 3 people he shot lived from much farther away despite not crossing state lines. Its such s stupid thing to still be bringing up

 

[Michaelangelo]

They were saying boo-urns tho

 

[Ichibanner]

He wasn’t sticking up for himself. He literally went to another state looking for a fight of some sort. Untrained idiot kids with guns is not the answer.

Rittenhouse spent time in Kenosha; his Dad lived there. He "literally" attempted to avoid a fight by walking away then running away from those who attacked him unprovoked. He maintained control of his weapon and showed good discipline hitting his targets and no bystanders.

It's okay to have an ignorant take on the matter but you choosing to display that ignorance is comical to say the least.

The adults who attacked Rittenhouse and refused to let him simply walk away to safety were the ones looking for a fight. Two of those shot by Rittenhouse weren't from Kenosha and would likely be alive today if they hadn't gone there and / or didn't attack the teenager.

 

[Area809]

for someone with no training you could make a training video of how kyle handled his firearm and showed restraint and actually dropped his rifle twice when guys were no longer a threat and only shot guys who directly assaulted him. I mean cops could take a lesson from the display of gun control that kyle demonstrated that night. Also please do realize you make yourself look dumb with the whole "he drove to a different state" stuff. It was a 20 minute drive. He worked in wisconsin, had friends and family in wisconsin. 2 of the 3 people he shot lived from much farther away despite not crossing state lines. Its such s stupid thing to still be bringing up

Aaah so the moron only drove 20 minutes. That totally makes it ok then lol.

 

[Area809]

Rittenhouse spent time in Kenosha; his Dad lived there. He "literally" attempted to avoid a fight by walking away then running away from those who attacked him unprovoked. He maintained control of his weapon and showed good discipline hitting his targets and no bystanders.

It's okay to have an ignorant take on the matter but you choosing to display that ignorance is comical to say the least.

The adults who attacked Rittenhouse and refused to let him simply walk away to safety were the ones looking for a fight. Two of those shot by Rittenhouse weren't from Kenosha and would likely be alive today if they hadn't gone there and / or didn't attack the teenager.

The 17 year old moron shouldn’t have been there. Now his life is relegated to having to grift off of his moronic decision to be there.

 

[Ichibanner]

The 17 year old moron shouldn’t have been there. Now his life is relegated to having to grift off of his moronic decision to be there.

The adult morons shouldn't have been there. Two won the "F*ck around and find out" grand prizes of dirt naps while a third got his arm destroyed for brandishing a handgun illegally concealed on his person and brought to bear against the armed child.

Who made out better? Kyle who received nearly one million dollars in crowd-funded support for his legal defense and is going around receiving talking fees or two dead idiots and one living idiot with a messed up arm that refused to let the kid walk to safety?

I find it funny that you demonize Rittenhouse for his legally justified actions while willfully ignoring the actions of idiots who involved themselves in the rioting, attacked a child, got shot by the child, and were shown to be in the wrong since Rittenhouse was acquitted.

Once again, you're posting out of ignorance. Post based on emotion all you wish. Kyle was justified in shooting his adult attackers; he was acquitted.

Attacking a child who is armed with an AR that he's proficient with is next level moronic behavior. If you don't agree you're as big a moron as those who were shot with it.

 

[nhbbear]

Is that what you call them at your Klan meetings?

Police guide that calls BLM a terrorist group draws outrage

This is a garbage article and biased against police as I have come to expect from the associated press. So I will dissect and disprove all the allegations within.




IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) — A prominent law enforcement training group is promoting a lengthy research document riddled with falsehoods and conspiracies that urges local police to treat Black Lives Matter activists as terrorists plotting a violent revolution.

This entire document is filled with falsehoods and I will demonstrate how and where.

The document distributed by the International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association contains misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric that could incite officers against protesters and people of color, critics said. It alleges Black Lives Matter and antifa, an umbrella term for leftist militants, are “revolutionary movements whose aims are to overthrow the U.S. government” and claims they are planning “extreme violence.”

Phillip Atiba Goff, a Yale University professor who is an expert on racial bias in policing, called the document dangerous, noting that the association is an important source of training materials for many small and midsize departments across the country.





“It’s stunning. It’s distressing in many ways. It’s untethered to reality,” said Goff, CEO of the Center for Policing Equity. “I worry that it leads to people dying unnecessarily.”

And he can prove that people are dying unnecessarily because of this training? How many people were killed by police during blm demonstrations compared to how many police have been murdered or shot during blm demonstrations? To the best of my knowledge, no one was killed by law enforcement at any such protest, yet, police officers have been murdered during protests. Baton Rouge, 2016, after the much justified shooting of alton sterling, a pedophile felon with a firearm that was actively trying to pull the gun out of his pocket while resisting arrest, led to three Baton Rouge officers being murdered a few days later. Two weeks later, a blm terrorist shot and killed nine at a blm protest for sterling in dallas. Laughably, that terrorist was killed by police when they strapped c-4 to a bomb robot and blew him to pieces. After the justified shooting of dijon kizzee(also a felon) in la, who fled from police and dropped a stolen gun. He then ran back to pick up the gun when he was shot, again, justifiably. That led to protests where two police officers were ambushed and shot in the face.




“Goff, whose group works with departments to make policing “less racist and deadly,” said the document showed why it’s important for critics to engage directly with local law enforcement to seek changes.

Otherwise, he said, “you are abandoning that profession to the worst impulses of this country.”

Putrid garbage. “Less racist and deadly and abandoned to the worst impulses of this country?” Black communities have the highest crime rate in every single city with the most shootings and murders. Police go where the violence and crime are the highest, so black neighborhoods are police more heavily-because of crime, not racist police. Are there racist and evil police? Yes, absolutely and they should be rooted out and fired.

An official with Color of Change, a nationwide racial justice organization, called on police departments Wednesday to cut training ties with the association, saying it encourages a warrior-style mindset that creates more conflict in communities.

“This is disturbing to read but not at all surprising to me. This is the type of thinking that is sadly pretty prominent within police culture,” said Scott Roberts, its senior director of criminal justice campaigns

This common talking point often used by radley balko, is a myth. The “warrior mindset” is false. Claiming it is “pretty prominent” is completely false. I have worked with hundreds of police officers and trained many officers in defensive tactics and taser and pepper spray. I spent much of my trainings focusing on deescalation but also taught officers how to arrest and fight using the least amount of force. There were very few officers I have ever worked with that had that “warrior mindset.” Very few-I can think of maybe five-most with military backgrounds. The rest want to serve their community to the best of their ability. But this article talks about how dangerous this mindset is, yet they have zero evidence to ever back that up. Their assertion that police are dangerous/deadly is the dangerous rhetoric they accuse the training of being because it turns people against police and encourages “engaging”(protests verbally and physically attacking all police) because of the rare occurrences of “police violence” which they describe as any police use of force (usually against armed black people) without ever looking into the event. The “say their name” campaign champions people like sterling, kizzee, mike brown, jacob blake, and many others who were violent and armed. They never even stop to consider what bad people these martyrs are and how many other black people(and other races as well) and how much carnage they have caused.


Protests across the nation were largely peaceful but occasionally marked by clashes with police or the destruction of property. Since then, many activists have been working to reduce the scope and cost of local police departments and overhaul police training.

Bullshit. When you have a thousand protests, but hundreds were violent, that’s not “largely peaceful.” Portland blm and antifa had over 120 straight days of riots-attacking police and destroying property with arson, vandalism, and attacking police with projectiles, Molotov cocktails and explosives. So, looking at the 120+ violent protests in Portland alone, plus kenosha and many other cities, you end up with probably 20-30%(guesstimate) of those protests devolving into violence. Yes, antifa is a terrorist organization as defined by splc and other organized that designate groups as domestic terrorists, yet neither antifa or blm appear on those lists. They define the domestic terrorism as using violence based upon political or ideological beliefs. Antifa alone is known for ALWAYS ending in violence or threats of violence. Even women’s rights events are met with trantifa violence as are peaceful religious sermons in public spaces.

If protests are peaceful, I encourage them. But they often contain violence or threats of violence and screaming in cops’ faces, throwing things, etc. and if it were the cops responsible, I wouldn’t have an issue with it, but after floyd, all police were targeted and blamed for what chauvin(one officer) did. That is not only unfair, it’s absurd. And if these protests were focused on the few that are wrongly killed-like Tyre Nichols-in TN (btw, I only capitalize the good people or non shitbags and use lower case for people I have no respect for, either politicians, district attorneys like larry krasner, alvin bragg, kim fox, george gascon, ben crump, al sharpton, or the violent felons that are often celebrated and mourned) instead of the shitbags like those I mentioned, I would be more supportive so long as they remain peaceful. Hell, they terrorize normal people by attacking them, destroying property, blocking traffic-basically unlawfully detaining them by surrounding their cars and preventing them from leaving.

TLDR, use a better article that has some relevance and truth.

 

[nhbbear]

The 17 year old moron shouldn’t have been there. Now his life is relegated to having to grift off of his moronic decision to be there.

All because leftist douche bags will never let him get an education or get a job outside of right wing leaning political job opportunities while they are all in favor of forgiving violent felons getting free education and jobs. Don’t get me wrong, I am in favor of education and job training in prison and ensuring that these once violent felons get job placements and are made to keep them rather than sponge off of welfare or return to crime.

I don’t like Kyle, but I 100% agree with his use of measured and justified force to protect his life from violent rioters and I believe he should be able to get a job or education without that business or university facing threats of violence or boycotting. He was ACQUITTED and should be able to return to a normal life. And he, or anyone else, should be able to engage at a speaking event without disruptions or threats of violence to shut speakers down. Only the left does this. What leftist speaking event has ever been shut down by threats of conservative violence? I can’t think of any.

Also, you said he shouldn’t have been there. Who had the right to be there? Violation of a curfew because of arson and violence because a violent rapist shitbag, jacob blake, got shot in a justified police use of force.