Search results for query: *

You're still nearly top-of-the-line on an absolute scale. Only the -3D variants of the 7950X & 7800X were released. Other than that, RAM has gotten a bit faster, and the latest Gen5 SSD have progressed. Nothing substantial has changed since you built.

LOL. God, the salt is the best. It really doesn't get any better than this.

The best part is if either of you muppets had the good sense just to leave the thread the first time you were corrected you wouldn't have ran face first into a brick wall of wrongness half a dozen more times. We'll call it the sunk cost fantasticness. It's so sweet.

LMFAO. It's hard to hear you with that dick shoved so far down your throat. This has been the most glorious thread. A glorious, glorious, glorious thread.

LOL, the sentence you highlighted referenced the past two decades. That was NOT the figure I cited for the 2015-2023 $1.7bn figure. That you might have found here: Allow me to highlight you blathering imbecile:

Yet I did not! LOL, just now, you didn't even realize the tax you referenced didn't go into effect until five years after the budgetary range expenditure tally I highlighted began. And now, after you have faceplanted supporting Taco for several pages concerning the population of a specific...

Duh! Holy bejeesus, it doesn't seem to matter how many times I explain this stuff to you guys. You two have botched population figures, total relevant government budgets, revenue collection chronologies, and more in this bungled attempt to undermine what was a simple, cohesive point. My point...

And here comes the bargaining after the fact once again. You got the populations wrong, so now you retreat to this. If you notice, the figure I quoted covers from 2015-2023, and yet this tax you're highlighting covering the Portland Metro area (the one DoctorTaco wasn't originally referencing...

Are you unable to comprehend it? The full study is linked. If you need help extracting figures, sure, but first you have to admit you can't do it yourself, and you need help. I'm not your mule, after all.

The figure I quoted was for the PHB which is drawn from the City of Portland, not a pooled fund.

LOL, yeah, I'm sure it was just a coincidental delay. Nothing funny. Not an active attempt to 'screen views for authenticity' resulting in that delay, or some other such nonsense, including whatever antics Google thinks it can quietly get away with as it takes whatever soft measures it can to...

This study already does. "Gender non-contentedness" subsumes the latter group. This is addressed in the first paragraph of the introduction section of the study's main body, FFS.

Or simply rubbing it in. I do love to gloat. Cliffs for those who don't want to waste their time going through it all: The population of Portland is 650K (this is a fact). The population of the Portland MSA that includes a city 80 miles away he's retroactively mocking is part of the...

Concession accepted. That makes two.

Says the guy who listed the population for a metro statistical area that does, in fact, include a city across the distance he's complaining about: This is not my definition, btw, nor is it something Wikipedia dreamed up. These are defined by the US federal government. You then backpedaled to...

You quoted the exact population for the Portland MSA that includes a city 80 miles to the south of you. Then you quoted a population for an imaginary MA. Maybe if you'd quoted the population figure for the metro definition you're now pretending to know so much about, while you obviously had no...