You say that, but all your posts are just echoing GOP propaganda, no? And your attempt to rubber-glue me is a blatant lie. FFS, I made multiple criticisms ITT.
You call me a hack, but I haven't defended the actions of a single politician or party in this thread. I've said numerous times that they both suck and I wouldn't advocate or vote for either.
Huh? First, these are all lies, and dumb ones. Why would anyone pay for fake oppo? You're aware that the dossier wasn't intended to be released and wasn't public until after the election, right? So this is another example of you just pushing a dumb partisan talking point without even thinking for a second about whether it actually makes sense. No servers were hidden from the FBI. They're the ones who reported the problem. Again, you're repeating a talking point without thinking about it.
Actual journalists and commentators covered it earlier than this, but here is the washington post covering the peepee dosier. If even the MSM is covering it, you know it has been reported on numerous times and at no risk of libel:
https://web.archive.org/web/2017102...6fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html
Original Paywalled article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...6fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html
Here is another MSM article covering the fact that the Clinton campaign withheld their servers from the FBI and instead hired crowdstrike:
https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/index.html
This was done with the intention of hiding the fact that it was a leak and not a hack, which wouldve been evident by the speed of the file transfer. Guess who hired Crowdstrike.....Yep....its that same attorney, Michael Sussmann who has been indicted for fabricating evidence and lying to the FBI.
Well, Manchin isn't an extreme right-winger, stupid. Every single member of your party is to his right. He's in a right-wing area so Democrats' choices are to pick someone who will agree with them half the time and win some battles or someone who will agree with them never and block everything they want. Obviously you know this, but you're playing dumb.
You clearly dont understand the concept of right wing and left wing.....You think "democrat=left", "republican=right". They are political philosophies, not just party labels. Rand Paul and Thomas Massie are ideologically to the left of many democrats, especially Manchin and Sinema.
Well, then maybe you should stop following politics, stop throwing out dumb partisan lies, and move to Antarctica or something. The world would be better off.
Nah...I believe it can be fixed. If people wake up and start smelling the corruption, things can change. But it can't as long as there are a bunch of partisan cheerleaders for political parties that lack principles, direction and a genuine desire to help the people of this country. This country would be far better of if both the republican and democrat cheerleaders started looking to alternatives to these two institutionally and morally corrupt parties. Parties have bit the dust in this country in the past; it can happen again.
That's how they choose to operate, but you don't actually need the gov't to license you to have freedom of speech, and if you support that (as you do), you don't support freedom of speech.
I'm perfectly ok with them wanting to censor and edit public discourse if that's how they'd like to run their business. However, if they aren't going to operate as a platform, then they shouldn't enjoy the blanket legal protections of one.
They literally don't, though. That's just another partisan lie that you're throwing out.
Section 230 says that
"No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (
47 U.S.C. § 230). In other words, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are protected against a range of laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do. The protected intermediaries include not only regular Internet Service Providers (ISPs), but also a range of "interactive computer service providers," including basically any online service that publishes third-party content. Though there are important exceptions for certain criminal and intellectual property-based claims, CDA 230 creates a broad protection that has allowed innovation and free speech online to flourish.
https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230
Um, Twitter isn't an Internet service provider. They're a web site.
Nobody claimed that they were....
Publishers are not legally responsible for everything published on their platform.
If Dave Weigel writes a story saying Britney Spears killed 5 people without any evidence, the Washington Post can be sued for libel if they publish the story.
If J03bl0W69 posts the same thing to twitter, twitter can not be sued due to the protection they enjoy from Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
The difference is one is a publisher and one is a platform. Dave Weigel is an employee of the Washington Post, J03bl0W69 is a random user of a platform.
And people enjoy the right to say what they want. Websites, however, cant talk. They aren't sentient.
https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2019/03/mueller-concludes-investigation/
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...ongress-attorney-general-william-barr-n986611
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/24/us/politics/mueller-report-summary.html
https://www.politico.com/story/2019...-to-release-summary-of-mueller-report-1233771
https://apnews.com/article/donald-t...orth-america-ea617240fe264947a967f8d13ed9a9a5
https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-mueller-report-russia-release-20190324-story.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-some-questions-left-unresolved-idUSKCN1R504O
https://www.usnews.com/news/nationa...s-no-evidence-trump-team-colluded-with-russia
How have you not heard about this yet???? It's impossible to have missed the story or for any one human being to be in this much denial....Are you okay?
LOL! Like I said, literally everything you say is just GOP propaganda, and you have no interest in whether it even sounds plausible.
You're either a clown or you can't read. I hate both major political parties in this country. I sincerely hope that both parties' voters find alternatives, because nothing will ever improve in this country if both the major parties in power are bought off by corporate interests. This country needs to move forward instead voting for the same two parties that are selling out the country and expecting different results.