they always say it's about power and not lust or sex. Which really makes no sense, there has to be an element of lust involved but I'd agree on the whole. Guys like Cosby would much rather have a woman as a corpse at his feet than a real, lucid, awake woman, it's dark and it's evil. Rape has been common in times of war and anywhere young men have congregated and just turned into a group of horny monkeys. It's dissapointing because some of us would like to think we wouldn't be involved in anything like that, history says different.
Had to Google her and damn you are correct sir.
Dude's 47 years old. Unless he's successful in some sort of Hail Mary appeal, it's game/set/match. What a dichotomy his early/late life will have turned out to be.So if 30 years is the minimum, he’ll get sentenced for AT LEAST 30, right?
Goddamn he’s finished
I would be interested in that as well.Not defending this guy; just playing devil's advocate. But, what's the actual evidence against this him? Read his Wiki page, and apart from multiple women making allegations against him, him denying the truth of those allegations, and being convicted, I'm not seeing any real details on the evidence against him.
You are not getting it. he did not "resort" to rape. Rape is what he is into.
The power dynamic, making a woman do what she does not want to do. Taking her when she is helpless. That is what turns him on.
Same thing with Cosby, Weinstein. The coercion and transgression is the point.
Weinstein had the money and connections to have a dozen 21-year-old blonde escorts lined up to suck his diseased dick at any time. but that was not the point, he wanted Mira Sorvino to do it.
Sex is easy for these guys to obtain. What they want is forced sex
So if 30 years is the minimum, he’ll get sentenced for AT LEAST 30, right?
Goddamn he’s finished
That’s what I was thinking- but with a 30 year minimum parole with good behavior I thought would be at least 10-15 years. I don’t know though.depends when he'll be eligible for parole...he may get out early for good behaviour.
That’s what I was thinking- but with a 30 year minimum parole with good behavior I thought would be at least 10-15 years. I don’t know though.
He will be fine,CA prison gonna be rough for him even in PC. Rapists are treated very badly and being a celeb anyways hell have to be put out of GP, BUT he has moolah and you can buy protection in prison if youre rich enough.
I haven't followed this case, but I remember when the Louis CK #MeToo thing happened that a precedent had been set for retroactive consent withdrawal and that it would cause problems.“A woman has an absolute right to say no,” Cohen argued. “But when the ‘no’ comes 16 years, 17 years later… that’s a very, very scary scenario.”
I did not follow the case, but if that quote is accurate, Yeah, damn scary.
He wouldn't need a prostitute he was rich and very handsome he could hang out anywhere in L.A county and have Boise dimes hitting on him all day. Sheeit Women hit on me and im way less pretty and I sound poor. I feel bad for his anus in L.A jails/CA prisons pretty dude going in with bad paper work.You know most thieves can afford the things they steal. If he just wanted to fuck, he could hire a prostitute. Dude is a rapist because he wanted to rape, that's all. Rape isn't a last resort to get sex for most people.
You know what is weird is that she was a rape victim in the movie havoc.Had to Google her and damn you are correct sir.
Not defending this guy; just playing devil's advocate. But, what's the actual evidence against him? Read his Wiki page, and apart from multiple women making allegations against him, him denying the truth of those allegations, and being convicted, I'm not seeing any real details on the evidence against him.