Yeah no argument here.
I'm just pointing out the difference between SARS-CoV-2 being known and suppressed starting in May, (which the PCR non-story is handwaving at), and let's say hypothetical solid evidence of suppressed knowledge of it starting a month earlier than is official (the first mysterious pneumonia onset announced - albeit after the fact - was Dec 9th I think), which would push back the known origin to November — is HUGE. That 7 month gap is the same as how long it took for the US to go from the first known case, a guy returning from Wuhan, to 170,000 deaths.
I wonder about travel bans, Australia did well of course, since they locked down hard after the border closed. The US was cooked IMO once they had detected a single case - there's just no way they would have gone along with a hard enough lockdown, by the time the first case was detected, several more were already in the country and near exponential spread was about guaranteed.
I guess in an ideal world, there would be rapid testing and transparent reporting as soon as the weird pneumonia was reported and definitely any evidence of community transmission, then the borders could be closed preemptively and/or people returning from the area could be intercepted and quarantined, but I imagine the powers that be might also be resistant to that idea while times are good.