- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Messages
- 23,867
- Reaction score
- 5,926
Can you tell me what claim I made that was refuted or not?You didn't read your own link?
Can you tell me what claim I made that was refuted or not?You didn't read your own link?
Okay, are you saying or not saying that she's making false claims?Can you tell me what claim I made that was refuted or not?
I dont know what to tell you. Again, Im not saying Tara Reades claim is convincing. Im saying IF the standard of being convinced was met by Carroll, it was also met by Reade. Theres plenty of people contradicting Carroll and poking holes in her story.@Bob Gray we've posted together for years. Read your own link.
What claim is refuted?
In your link she has zero credibility whatsoever. Carrol hasn't been taken to task like that, has she?I dont know what to tell you. Again, Im not saying Tara Reades claim is convincing. Im saying IF the standard of being convinced was met by Carroll, it was also met by Reade. Theres plenty of people contradicting Carroll and poking holes in her story.
It's flippin bizarre for someone to post claims that have refuted everything she said, lol.
In your link she has zero credibility whatsoever. Carrol hasn't been taken to task like that, has she?
Will Kid Rock and Ted Nugent be there?so, you coming to the drunken barn dance tonight?
The amount of her lies that were pointed out were hilarious.last i checked she didn't fly to the uk or russia to avoid telling her side of the story during a civil trial while under oath
Will Kid Rock and Ted Nugent be there?
Why does Carrols claim have any credibility? She doesnt remember when it happened. There were no witnesses putting them together. She had a diary where she never mentions it, etc. What is the compelling piece of evidence that Carroll has? Theres nothing but an accusation.In your link she has zero credibility whatsoever. Carrol hasn't been taken to task like that, has she?
She ended up moving to Russia.
Why does Carrols claim have any credibility? She doesnt remember when it happened. There were no witnesses putting them together. She had a diary where she never mentions it, etc. What is the compelling piece of evidence that Carroll has? Theres nothing but an accusation.
Okay, so again, as I said before, you expect a witness to see the sexual abuse for it to go to a legal standpoint? This is why 1% of rape cases end up in prosecution. And yet you're giving credibility to another chick's rape? I don't know why you have a hard on for Captain Bonespurs, I didn't have you down like that.Why does Carrols claim have any credibility? She doesnt remember when it happened. There were no witnesses putting them together. She had a diary where she never mentions it, etc. What is the compelling piece of evidence that Carroll has? Theres nothing but an accusation.
Why does Carrols claim have any credibility? She doesnt remember when it happened. There were no witnesses putting them together. She had a diary where she never mentions it, etc. What is the compelling piece of evidence that Carroll has? Theres nothing but an accusation.
Who knows, bro. Why TF didn't Trump show up to the civil trial to refute anything? You're trying to argue something that has already been litigated a few times and judgements already handed down. Are you a lawyer? Trump's lawyers couldn't even get him out of this shit.
I know you dont care, thats my point. People only care because its Trump.
He was found liable, not guilty. Yet here we are in a thread full of people saying hes guilty of rape and calling him a rapist, even though theyd never argue that the evidence presented in the trial should be enough to find anyone guilty of rape.
Because Trump.
I remember some hubbub about Franken, yeah. But it doesnt matter much. Im not saying nothing ever happens to anyone else on one side or another. I dont think Trump is being prosecuted for being Republican. I think hes being prosecuted because hes Trump. Although, being fair, he does put a big, giant target on himself.