- Joined
- Oct 3, 2009
- Messages
- 2,907
- Reaction score
- 3,158
There many polls in which people might have changed their vote had this been known.
Why hide it/ classify it as child porn/ lock out the White House Spokeswoman
Posting hunter dick pics probably against TOS.Cliffs? Looks to me they were worried about hacked stuff being released but it's hard to tell cause following Twitter sucks. Don't know why people like it's lay out.
polls in most brightest red district in kentucky? come on sherbro, polls dont mean nothing. just look at the results of the 2016 and 2020 elections. and where's that red wave that they promised this year?
all of a sudden those 81 million voters who hate donald trump and voted just to have him removed of office would have changed their mind and voted for the guy that they hate, had they known that some other guy who's name isn't on the ballot smoked a bunch of crack and banged a bunch of ho's. if they would have known that some crackhead owns a laptop, they would have had a change of heart and voted for the guy who they wanted nothing more than to be removed from office, and probably even sent to prison too!
yup. thats gotta be it. chud logic tew strong.
His business
Lol im sure glenn knows his way with some stallions
It's much easier this way for very unintelligent people grab one fragment and let their special little brains run wild from there.instead of firing a chain of 50 tweet, can't they just put out some kind of article and post a link to the story in their tweets? this is amateur hour shit right here.
If there's nothing to it then why did they cover it up?I'm not convinced there's really anything to it. It looks like a nothing burger.
Taibbi seemed to think soIt's much easier this way for very unintelligent people grab one fragment and let their special little brains run wild from there.
Plus it's a marketing stunt for Musk and Twitter; not investigative journalism lol
Probably to slow down misinformation that would sway the public. Maybe they thought thats what it was. Saw they were worried about hacker stuff. Either way it's a nothing burger to everyone but magas.If there's nothing to it then why did they cover it up?
No and no. You can read many articles from years ago asking what happened to him; for example:Before you attack Matt Taibibi, just know that he is a liberal and a well respected journalist
He's been attacked recently by liberals for defending Alex Jones, equating Rachel Maddow to Sean Hannity, insisting Russia wouldn't invade Ukraine, and more.What has been done here can and WILL be done the other way
Meaning, when conservatives gain control again, and they WILL gain control again as its only a matter of how much time passes, they can use this tactic against the Democrats.
So, both sides should be condemning this
But I predict that Matt Taibibi will get attacked and his personal character be called into question by the Democrats because this tactic of suppressing news stories has benefited them in the past. But cannot look into the future where the very same tactic will be recycled by the other side and used again, only the other way around.
How was Hunter on a Ukrainian energy board, was this his field? He was a crack head
Who was Trump on the phone with, which led to his impeachment?