Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread

Is this reasonable? or a slippery slope?

  • Total voters
    366
Status
Not open for further replies.
81TGQaXnlEL._AC_UY1000_.jpg
 
Ares Black said:
I'm sure you have a very credible source for that data.

Is it SuperSally888?
Click to expand...
The response will just be everything but the actual particulars of the original post.

Here are 16 videos from some random blog. One may address the topic at hand because there is no actual knowledge of the post that was made but what about this.

If you can find a source it usually actually says the opposite when you read it with the entirety of the data.

Big pharma is corrupt but this person charging 5 easy payments of $9.99 (anti vax only fans) is just getting the truth out there.

The secret is they all just want to make some money and these anti vax idiots are just copying the same sensationalist news headlines they constantly bitch about. It’s the same play book to get shares and revenue from clicks.

One day they will work it out.
 
Ares Black said:
Well then it's a good thing I got the Astra-Zeneca and the Moderna, amirite????


Now tell me more about what SuperSally888 has to say on her blog! Any new developments??
Click to expand...

Lol, sure


Moderna fraud-




On astrazenica you are aware it was manufactured by Russia? Perhaps not the wisest choice considering the political divide.


How has she been discredited as a liar? The information she states is quite literally Pfizers own documents? You do realise that accusations aren't evidence?


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism

"Journalism is the production and distribution of reports on the interaction of events, facts, ideas, and people that are the "news of the day" and that informs society to at least some degree. The word, a noun, applies to the occupation (professional or not), the methods of gathering information, and the organizing literary styles. Journalistic media include print, television, radio, Internet, and, in the past, newsreels.

The appropriate role for journalism varies from countries to country, as do perceptions of the profession, and the resulting status. In some nations, the news media are controlled by government and are not independent.[1] In others, news media are independent of the government and operate as private industry. In addition, countries may have differing implementations of laws handling the freedom of speech, freedom of the press as well as slander and libel cases."

And

https://en.unesco.org/investigative-journalism

"Investigative Journalism means the unveiling of matters that are concealed either deliberately by someone in a position of power, or accidentally, behind a chaotic mass of facts and circumstances - and the analysis and exposure of all relevant facts to the public. In this way investigative journalism crucially contributes to freedom of expression and media development, "



Mmm so yes she is an investigative journalist.

But in case you don't get it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf
"Naomi Rebekah Wolf (born November 12, 1962) is an American feminist author and journalist."



Anyway, Yale University...

https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/yale-university-1426

"Yale University is a private institution that was founded in 1701. It has a total undergraduate enrollment of 6,536 (fall 2021), its setting is city, and the campus size is 373 acres. It utilizes a semester-based academic calendar. Yale University's ranking in the 2022-2023 edition of Best Colleges is National Universities, #3. Its tuition and fees are $62,250."

No again I guess.

Oxford?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oxford

"The University of Oxford is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England. There is evidence of teaching as early as 1096,[2] making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world's second-oldest university in continuous operation"

Certainly has history.

"ranked among the most prestigious universities in the world."


Or perhaps a simple comparison for you, Harvard vs Oxford?

https://thinkstudent.co.uk/which-university-is-better-harvard-vs-oxford/

"Ranked as two of the most prestigious universities in the world, "


Soooo I think she qualifies as both an investigative journalist AND well educated.


Perhaps far more so then you...
 
mon said:
Lol, sure


Moderna fraud-




On astrazenica you are aware it was manufactured by Russia? Perhaps not the wisest choice considering the political divide.


How has she been discredited as a liar? The information she states is quite literally Pfizers own documents? You do realise that accusations aren't evidence?


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism

"Journalism is the production and distribution of reports on the interaction of events, facts, ideas, and people that are the "news of the day" and that informs society to at least some degree. The word, a noun, applies to the occupation (professional or not), the methods of gathering information, and the organizing literary styles. Journalistic media include print, television, radio, Internet, and, in the past, newsreels.

The appropriate role for journalism varies from countries to country, as do perceptions of the profession, and the resulting status. In some nations, the news media are controlled by government and are not independent.[1] In others, news media are independent of the government and operate as private industry. In addition, countries may have differing implementations of laws handling the freedom of speech, freedom of the press as well as slander and libel cases."

And

https://en.unesco.org/investigative-journalism

"Investigative Journalism means the unveiling of matters that are concealed either deliberately by someone in a position of power, or accidentally, behind a chaotic mass of facts and circumstances - and the analysis and exposure of all relevant facts to the public. In this way investigative journalism crucially contributes to freedom of expression and media development, "



Mmm so yes she is an investigative journalist.

But in case you don't get it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf
"Naomi Rebekah Wolf (born November 12, 1962) is an American feminist author and journalist."



Anyway, Yale University...

https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/yale-university-1426

"Yale University is a private institution that was founded in 1701. It has a total undergraduate enrollment of 6,536 (fall 2021), its setting is city, and the campus size is 373 acres. It utilizes a semester-based academic calendar. Yale University's ranking in the 2022-2023 edition of Best Colleges is National Universities, #3. Its tuition and fees are $62,250."

No again I guess.

Oxford?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oxford

"The University of Oxford is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England. There is evidence of teaching as early as 1096,[2] making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world's second-oldest university in continuous operation"

Certainly has history.

"ranked among the most prestigious universities in the world."


Or perhaps a simple comparison for you, Harvard vs Oxford?

https://thinkstudent.co.uk/which-university-is-better-harvard-vs-oxford/

"Ranked as two of the most prestigious universities in the world, "


Soooo I think she qualifies as both an investigative journalist AND well educated.


Perhaps far more so then you...
Click to expand...

Lol. You need a new hobby.
 
mon said:
Lol, sure


Moderna fraud-




On astrazenica you are aware it was manufactured by Russia? Perhaps not the wisest choice considering the political divide.


How has she been discredited as a liar? The information she states is quite literally Pfizers own documents? You do realise that accusations aren't evidence?


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism

"Journalism is the production and distribution of reports on the interaction of events, facts, ideas, and people that are the "news of the day" and that informs society to at least some degree. The word, a noun, applies to the occupation (professional or not), the methods of gathering information, and the organizing literary styles. Journalistic media include print, television, radio, Internet, and, in the past, newsreels.

The appropriate role for journalism varies from countries to country, as do perceptions of the profession, and the resulting status. In some nations, the news media are controlled by government and are not independent.[1] In others, news media are independent of the government and operate as private industry. In addition, countries may have differing implementations of laws handling the freedom of speech, freedom of the press as well as slander and libel cases."

And

https://en.unesco.org/investigative-journalism

"Investigative Journalism means the unveiling of matters that are concealed either deliberately by someone in a position of power, or accidentally, behind a chaotic mass of facts and circumstances - and the analysis and exposure of all relevant facts to the public. In this way investigative journalism crucially contributes to freedom of expression and media development, "



Mmm so yes she is an investigative journalist.

But in case you don't get it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf
"Naomi Rebekah Wolf (born November 12, 1962) is an American feminist author and journalist."



Anyway, Yale University...

https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/yale-university-1426

"Yale University is a private institution that was founded in 1701. It has a total undergraduate enrollment of 6,536 (fall 2021), its setting is city, and the campus size is 373 acres. It utilizes a semester-based academic calendar. Yale University's ranking in the 2022-2023 edition of Best Colleges is National Universities, #3. Its tuition and fees are $62,250."

No again I guess.

Oxford?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oxford

"The University of Oxford is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England. There is evidence of teaching as early as 1096,[2] making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world's second-oldest university in continuous operation"

Certainly has history.

"ranked among the most prestigious universities in the world."


Or perhaps a simple comparison for you, Harvard vs Oxford?

https://thinkstudent.co.uk/which-university-is-better-harvard-vs-oxford/

"Ranked as two of the most prestigious universities in the world, "


Soooo I think she qualifies as both an investigative journalist AND well educated.


Perhaps far more so then you...
Click to expand...


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/05/books/review-outrages-naomi-wolf.html

Her first, career-making book, “The Beauty Myth,” is well-known for exaggerating the number of women who died of anorexia (Wolf stated that anorexia kills 150,000 women annually; the actual figure at the time, in the mid-1990s, was said to be closer to 50 or 60). One academic paper found that fully 18 of the 23 statistics about anorexia in the book were inaccurate and coined a term — “WOLF” (Wolf’s Overdo and Lie Factor) — to determine the degree to which Wolf was wrong: “On average, a statistic on anorexia by Naomi Wolf should be divided by eight to get close to the real figure.”

This is to say nothing of Wolf’s unhinged public pronouncements. She has alleged the American military is importing Ebola from Africa with an intention of spreading it at home, that Edward Snowden might be a government plant and that she has seen the figure of Jesus while she was (inexplicably) in the form of a 13-year-old boy. She appeared on Alex Jones’s show, and accused the government of intercepting and reading her daughter’s mail.

Throughout it all, she remains impervious to criticism. “I’m lucky,” she said in a recent profile in The Guardian. “I had a good education. I know my books are true.”

https://www.thecut.com/2019/05/naomi-wolf-interview-book-error-bbc-interview.html



So much investigative journalism...

You still haven't learnt to read the articles or vet your sources.

Wait does this make me an investigative journalist?
 
Aa
Ares Black said:
Lol. You need a new hobby.
Click to expand...

Thank you, I to acknowledge you being incorrect in your previous and multitude of statements. I ignore a lot of your rambling trash but good manners means I must answer and reply a little

Got to run, maybe actually listen/read one if the sources I provided. I'd actually start with Naomi Wolfs interview then go onto the Moderna fraud.

In fraud the Pfizers docs very clearly show copious amounts as well so I recommend



"Sonia Elijah, who is an investigative journalist for Trial Site News and TCW (as well as her own substack). They discuss the incredibly poor state of journalism and medical coverage (propaganda)"

Anyway good luck in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruv
mon said:
Aa


Thank you, I to acknowledge you being incorrect in your previous and multitude of statements. I ignore a lot of your rambling trash but good manners means I must answer and reply a little

Got to run, maybe actually listen/read one if the sources I provided. I'd actually start with Naomi Wolfs interview then go onto the Moderna fraud.

In fraud the Pfizers docs very clearly show copious amounts as well so I recommend



"Sonia Elijah, who is an investigative journalist for Trial Site News and TCW (as well as her own substack). They discuss the incredibly poor state of journalism and medical coverage (propaganda)"

Anyway good luck in the future.
Click to expand...

Lol. You're hopeless.

You are literally incapable of identifying a credible source. All blogs and podcasts from grifters.

You're a mark.
 
Ares Black said:
<Huh2>


But she went to Oxford, Sherbro!

Oxford! Have you heard of Oxford?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oxford
Click to expand...

You did say she wasn't a investigational journalist and wasn't well educated, as shown she is both.

As I said the intellectually dishonest never attack the information or content, they try to discredit the source (website) or person.

I have given plenty of information, sources etc and I hope the people reading listen, read because the narrative is all bullshit.

Just pfizers criminal history alone should be enough to get people to pause before touching something from them, throw in the shear number of lies and factually incorrect statements from the government etc is a massive concern to any person critically thinking.
 
Last edited:
mon said:
You did say she wasn't a investigational journalist and wasn't well educated, as shown she is both.
Click to expand...
I never said she wasn't well educated. She went to fucking Yale and Oxford. I said that she wasn't an "actual investigational journalist", which she most certainly isn't.

She's an author, a professional feminist turned professional conspiracy theorist. She has been discredited for lying. She has shown signs of mental illness.

You want to believe her, go right ahead. Buy her book.
 
Ares Black said:
@mon

You should buy this book too, only $27 for paperback!

https://www.amazon.ca/Outrages-Sex-Censorship-Criminalization-Love/dp/1645020169

It's notable for "being used as an example... of the danger of misreading historical sources"

Ms. Wolf hasn't been credible for almost a decade. She wasn't selling enough books as a third-wave feminist, so she pivoted to conspiracy theorist.
Click to expand...

From the wiki...
Wolf attended Yale University, receiving her Bachelor of Arts in English literature in 1984. From 1985 to 1987, she was a Rhodes Scholar at New College, Oxford.[20] Wolf's initial period at Oxford University was difficult as she experienced "raw sexism, overt snobbery and casual antisemitism". Her writing became so personal and subjective that her tutor advised against submitting her doctoral thesis. Wolf told interviewer Rachel Cooke, writing for The Observer, in 2019: "My subject didn't exist. I wanted to write feminist theory, and I kept being told by the dons there was no such thing." Her writing at this time formed the basis of her first book, The Beauty Myth.[21][22]

Wolf ultimately returned to Oxford, completing her Doctor of Philosophy degree in English literature in 2015. Her thesis, supervised by Stefano Evangelista of Trinity College, formed the basis for her 2019 book Outrages: Sex, Censorship, and the Criminalization of Love.[23][24]

Christina Hoff Sommers criticized Wolf for publishing the estimate that 150,000 women were dying every year from anorexia. Sommers said she traced the source to the American Anorexia and Bulimia Association, who stated that they were misquoted; the figure refers to sufferers, not fatalities. Wolf's citation came from a book by Brumberg, who referred to an American Anorexia and Bulimia Association newsletter and misquoted the newsletter. Wolf accepted the error and changed it in future editions. Sommers gave an estimate for the number of fatalities in 1990 as 100–400.[39][40] The annual anorexia casualties in the US were estimated to be around 50 to 60 per year in the mid-1990s.[41] In 1995, for an article in The Independent on Sunday, British journalist Joan Smith recalled asking Wolf to explain her unsourced assertion in The Beauty Myth that the UK "has 3.5 million anorexics or bulimics (95 per cent of them female), with 6,000 new cases yearly". Wolf replied, according to Smith, that she had calculated the statistics from patients with eating disorders at one clinic.[32]

Caspar Schoemaker of the Netherlands Trimbos Institute published a paper in the academic journal Eating Disorders demonstrating that of the 23 statistics cited by Wolf in Beauty Myth, 18 were incorrect, with Wolf citing numbers that average out to 8 times the number in the source she was citing.[42]

I wonder if maybe she might have made a few more mistakes with the new career choice topic...
 
Some basic fact checking of Naomi Wolfs statements of women's health and the feotal deaths of babies within the Pfizer trial.

https://www.nutritruth.org/single-p...ted-pregnant-women-lost-their-baby-but-pfizer

"46% of the mothers exposed to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection suffered an adverse reaction.

Of those 124 mothers suffering an adverse reaction, 49 were considered non-serious adverse reactions, whereas 75 were considered serious. This means 58% of the mothers who reported suffering adverse reactions suffered a serious adverse event ranging from uterine contraction to foetal death"

Like her affiliated website this website has the papers to download or just go to the children's health defence website.

"But here’s where things get rather concerning. Pfizer state that of the 270 pregnancies they have absolutely no idea what happened in 238 of them."
.
"But here are the known outcomes of the remaining pregnancies –

* Spontaneous Abortion (miscarriage) x23,
* Outcome pending x5,
* Premature baby with neonatal death x 2,
* Spontaneous Abortion with intrauterine death x2,
* Spontaneous Abortion with neonatal death x 1
* Normal outcome x1"

So the pregnant women they didn't/couldn't lose only 1 was a normal outcome(short term at least)


"There were 34 outcomes altogether at the time of the report, but 5 of them were still pending. Pfizer note that only 1 of the 29 known outcomes were normal, whilst 28 of the 29 outcomes resulted in the loss/death of the baby. This equates to 97% of all known outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child.

When we include the 5 cases where the outcome was still pending it equates to 82% of all outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child. This equates to an average of around 90% between the 82% and 97% figure."



She touched on the fraud but this site lays it down...



"We exclusively revealed in July 2021 how data had been manipulated by scientists carrying out a real world study for the CDC to show that Covid-19 vaccines were safe for use during pregnancy.

The authors claimed that the number of people to suffer a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) during the study was 104 out of 827 completed pregnancies, equating the risk of miscarriage at 12.6%; 7 – 12% lower than the risk of miscarriage in the general population."
.
.
"However, our analysis proved that these numbers were extremely misleading due to the fact that of the 827 completed pregnancies, 700 / 86% of the women had received a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy, meaning it was impossible for them to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they can only occur prior to week 20 of pregnancy.
(Reminds me of certain lying, manipulating sherdog posters. Playing stupid little word play games thinking it makes them right)

This meant that just 127 women received either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the first/second trimester, with 104 of the woman sadly losing their baby.
(Not TECHNICALLY a miscarriage though, so of course its safe)

Therefore the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%, not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study, and the authors of the study have since admitted that they made a mistake, issuing a correction six months too late because the study has been used to justify Covid-19 vaccination of pregnant women and new mothers around the world"


I won't lie this is a rediculous waste of my time as the data and her story is written in Pfizers own documents but we have a couple of morons that are trying to attack it by trying to manipulate peoples perceptions by attacking the source and/or the person/people but never the data. Which anyone can download including breakdowns by qualified doctors and scientists.

Its far better for the morons not to be breeding but for the people that could contribute positively for our species and want children they might want to consider the potential ramifications of the study AND the workd wide fertility data which indicates a massive correlation between the vaxx and fertility drops.


Naomi Wolfs affiliated website which has downloadable caches of the Pfizer docs.

https://campaigns.dailyclout.io/campaign/brand/cc3b3e5a-6536-4738-8ed6-5ee368c67240

In fact there are so many of these websites that shows the pfizer study for what it is, fraud combined with collusion and willful blindness and Malfeasance.


Earlier in the thread I had posted the Israeli study in male fertility. The conclusion said they were confident that the fertility returned to normal. It excluded to show the data or how/why they came to this conclusion so you might want to consider they lied as so many had as well.



Edit- Going on the above it appears Naomi Wolf is 100% correct.

But but but shes a feminist....
But but but she may have been wrong in the past.
But but but but but but I'm attacking the person and/or the platform because the analysis and data is correct.



Lol I'm a mark @Ares Black , you have a name for black lives matters and other false rubbish. Yet you have injected yourself with an experimental gene drug that was manufactured by the German and Chinese company. Two of the most historically racist and definately genocidal regimes the world has ever seen. Good luck with that because the data is getting worse by the day.

I will say I've had covid once almost a year ago after exposing myself deliberately, had it once yet have been around it since. Still don't know one bad covid outcome, myself included but the more randoms I talk to the more adverse reactions and co incidence stories I'm hearing. Than you ask the vaxxed if they believe they get sick more often and most say they're getting sick very often.
I cannot imagine the cognitive dissonance needed to believe this shit, besides brain damage.....
 
Last edited:
https://drjessesantiano.com/the-complete-list-of-the-pfizer-adverse-events-of-special-interest/


#2 in the H -
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/hemophagocytic-lymphohistiocystosis

"Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare disease that usually occurs in infants and young children. It may also occur in adults. Children usually inherit the disease. In adults, many different conditions, including infections and cancer, can cause HLH.

If you have HLH, your body's defense system, called your immune system, does not work normally. Certain white blood cells — histiocytes and lymphocytes — attack your other blood cells. These abnormal blood cells collect in your spleen and liver, causing these organs to enlarge"6"


Sounds a bit like auto immune disease, just shit Allround
 
The doubling down by the members that have taken the globalist poison is classic stuff.

To be honest I'm glad im a conspiracy theorist.
Because the best thing about being a conspiracy theorist is not having myocarditis and muddy blood.
 
Nimrod said:
The doubling down by the members that have taken the globalist poison is classic stuff.

To be honest I'm glad im a conspiracy theorist.
Because the best thing about being a conspiracy theorist is not having myocarditis and muddy blood.
Click to expand...

Amazing how much a person can change in 2 years.
- I'm now in the antivaxxer camp and will never just trust the science again
- Have to admit that there may be far more to weather manipulation and chemtrails then I ever thought.
- The WEF style infiltration is absolutely 100% real and obvious.
 
Ares Black said:
Lol. You need a new hobby.
Click to expand...
He's making YOU look like a FOOL. You can beg him to get a new hobby but the better option is to admit that you were suckered by Big Pharma. The experimental injections are neither safe or effective. Everyone knows that now including YOU.
 
Ares Black said:
I never said she wasn't well educated. She went to fucking Yale and Oxford. I said that she wasn't an "actual investigational journalist", which she most certainly isn't.

She's an author, a professional feminist turned professional conspiracy theorist. She has been discredited for lying. She has shown signs of mental illness.

You want to believe her, go right ahead. Buy her book.
Click to expand...
Chuckle. She has NOT been discredited. Thank's for the laugh though. I'm just glad I wasn't drinking my morning coffee when I read your ridiculous statement. It's especially humorous coming from you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,239,660
Messages
55,643,230
Members
174,870
Latest member
bucklad

Share this page

Back
Top