- Joined
- Dec 9, 2018
- Messages
- 2,183
- Reaction score
- 4,669
How big does someone's ego have to be to make your own thread with a personalized scorecard when there's several threads discussing it on the main thread. Narcissism.
im fine with a a draw, but scoring it for grasso is insane imoFair rebuttal.
I guess because "leading" for three minutes ≠ being nearly finished for two.
In the 2nd, Val was dropped and nearly finished. She "came back" with a desperate takedown, but didn't do anything with it. If anything, Val was getting worked by Alexa from the bottom.
In the 3rd, Val was dominating nearly the entire time, and was also a submission threat at one point.
In the end, because of these back-and-forth arguments, the Draw is valid.
No clear winner, and arguments to be made for both sides.
Val did not beat the Champion (in the same fashion she was finished in the first fight by the Champion).
And, at the end of the second fight, Val was just about finished for the second time.
A "draw" is accurate and the Champion deserved to retain the belt.
How big does someone's ego have to be to make your own thread with a personalized scorecard when there's several threads discussing it on the main thread. Narcissism.
im fine with a a draw, but scoring it for grasso is insane imo
No, It's not insane but a 10-8 in round 5 was because of exactly thisIs it really "insane" to have given Grasso 4 and 5?
Grasso had the knee sequence in 4, which was the most memorable sequence in the round, and she completely threatened/dominated Shevchenko at the end of Round 5.
Both rounds are debatable, not a clear landslide for either.
We agree that a "draw" isn't out of line
I just don't see how you score the 5th 10-8 and not the 3rd
No, It's not insane but a 10-8 in round 5 was because of exactly this
I just don't see how you score the 5th 10-8 and not the 3rd
How did the knees appear "more damaging and more dangerous" to you? Was it just because they were knees instead of punches? Because to me it didn't look like Valentina was hurt at all by them - and on the contrary, we can definitely point to Alexa being hurt by the strikes Valentina landed.
- Round 4: Hardest round to score. Shevchenko came across as quicker, slicker, landing more — but Grasso had that sequence of unanswered knees, and appeared to be more damaging and more dangerous. Shevchenko looks to be "point fighting," while Grasso looks to be trying to finish. 10-9, Grasso, due to the knee sequence, IMO, but Shevchenko looked busier and did score that cut.
How did the knees appear "more damaging and more dangerous" to you? Was it just because they were knees instead of punches? Because to me it didn't look like Valentina was hurt at all by them - and on the contrary, we can definitely point to Alexa being hurt by the strikes Valentina landed.
If you need to make it a draw because of unspeakable reasons.I just don't see how you score the 5th 10-8 and not the 3rd
It wasn't just a takedown though.
It was a takedown + continual, very real & perpetual submission threat + utter domination to the last second.
"(However, I don't see how anyone could have scored a 47-47 draw???)"
Here's how:
Val Grasso
10. 9
9. 10
10. 8
9. 10
9. 10
----------------
47 - 47