- Joined
- Jun 3, 2021
- Messages
- 8,691
- Reaction score
- 10,437
I don’t
LOL, WTF are you going on about?he’s just some dude, who can fight , who’s a little crazy like all of us
What if what he’s saying is true%? For the most part
Everyone has arguments with their spouses . Heated ones too.
Alcohol is the #1 reason for a lot of things and no one knows the depth of their story as a couple better than them.
I’m not saying he’s innocent, but still . It’s not like he has a lawyer tweeting for him, because if he did, he wouldn’t be tweeting. I’m not a jj fan. I’ve railed against some of his wins in the cage.. he’s just some dude, who can fight , who’s a little crazy like all of us
Is it a bad thing to give him the benefit of the doubt?
What if what he’s saying is true%? For the most part
Everyone has arguments with their spouses . Heated ones too.
Alcohol is the #1 reason for a lot of things and no one knows the depth of their story as a couple better than them.
I’m not saying he’s innocent, but still . It’s not like he has a lawyer tweeting for him, because if he did, he wouldn’t be tweeting. I’m not a jj fan. I’ve railed against some of his wins in the cage.. he’s just some dude, who can fight , who’s a little crazy like all of us
Is it a bad thing to give him the benefit of the doubt?
You'd definitely get wifed by Jon Jones.
I’d bet money your IQ is either subpar or you didn’t actually look into the details of what happened. His wife was found with blood on her phase, what benefit of the doubt are we giving him?What if what he’s saying is true%? For the most part
Everyone has arguments with their spouses . Heated ones too.
Alcohol is the #1 reason for a lot of things and no one knows the depth of their story as a couple better than them.
I’m not saying he’s innocent, but still . It’s not like he has a lawyer tweeting for him, because if he did, he wouldn’t be tweeting. I’m not a jj fan. I’ve railed against some of his wins in the cage.. he’s just some dude, who can fight , who’s a little crazy like all of us
Is it a bad thing to give him the benefit of the doubt?
So you feel bad for all alcoholics who haven't gotten sober yet, is what you're saying? And the chaos that the alcohol brings into their lives (90%+ of the time)?What if what he’s saying is true%? For the most part
Everyone has arguments with their spouses . Heated ones too.
Alcohol is the #1 reason for a lot of things and no one knows the depth of their story as a couple better than them.
I’m not saying he’s innocent, but still . It’s not like he has a lawyer tweeting for him, because if he did, he wouldn’t be tweeting. I’m not a jj fan. I’ve railed against some of his wins in the cage.. he’s just some dude, who can fight , who’s a little crazy like all of us
Is it a bad thing to give him the benefit of the doubt?
Mentally he'd probably be fine if he didn't have the addict gene.It's a shame, He's so talented, but mentally he cant get it together. people say he's like a spoiled brat (gus, DC) and it sort of makes sense. I just cant see how much struggle could be in the life of someone who had 2 older brothers in the nfl before he was 20 and had state wrestling credentials at a young age.
I know, and it's hard for me not to feel sympathetic toward him though it's like he had a monkeys paw wish to be the strongest fighter, but in exchange he'd be the weakest manMentally he'd probably be fine if he didn't have the addict gene.
Or maybe not and he'd self-sabatage some other way.
But the AA rooms are full of down and outters who probably never had a chance at succeeding in this crazy world AND highly successful people who had every chance, succeeded greatly, and still couldn't stop. The gene doesn't discriminate.
I'm not excusing his behavior. Until he pays consequences he has no reason to change. And until he changes he's going to stay miserable and continue to bring chaos to everyone around him.