- Joined
- Mar 16, 2007
- Messages
- 3,799
- Reaction score
- 958
Entitlement has nothing to do with it you goof. Common sense does. Shove that up your anus. Kid were you even watching MMA back then??? Don't talk to me with that tone.
It isn't recency bias when I was enjoying MMA in both eras. Naming names on a resume is not really telling. Like you said most weren't in their prime. Although I will give Griffin full credit for the Franklin win. Rampage outscored him IMO, but it's still good for his resume.
But if you put Griffin against the guys Jan has fought recently, then you wouldn't get nearly the same results.
It's like the first time I watched Jones fight(the Bonnar fight). I knew he was better than Griffin and recency bias had nothing to do with it. Some things are just visible.
I think Prime Forrest could beat over the hill jacare, chinny rockhold, and unproven Reyes tbh... could he lose those? Sure, but I can definitely see him winning those fights as well.
I don’t think Jan is as good as u think he is apparently, I think he is strong and solid in the clinch and solid grappling but other than his power I don’t find his striking that incredible and he is SLOW SLOW SLOW...
I can definitely see prime Forrest beating the guys Jan beat.
Also unless Jan can tire izzy out with clinch work, I see Adesanya making it look easy tbh.. jan’s power scares me but I don’t see him landing much on the feet unless he can wear izzy down first.